Card: drop the protocol-name remarks

README.md

@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ depth = s.depth(0, [16], size=(848, 480))                           # metres (No
 
 ## Benchmark
 
-**Multi-view video generation** (protocol `vpm-v1`). Given frame 16 of every view, generate the next 64 frames of
+**Multi-view video generation.** Given frame 16 of every view, generate the next 64 frames of
 every view. The generated views are scored on three axes:
 
 - **appearance:** PSNR, SSIM, LPIPS and FVD;
@@ -179,9 +179,8 @@ VPM (V+T) also on 3D point trajectories. X-WAM is evaluated on the robot subsets
 | | VPM (V) | ✓ | 62.85 | 20.96 | 0.010 | 26.54 |
 | | **VPM (V+T)** | ✓ | **56.48** | **22.10** | **0.007** | **33.92** |
 
-The toolkit's default protocol `vpm-v1` differs from the paper's evaluation in some details, so its scores are not
-identical to this table. Its outputs also include SSIM, LPIPS, δ mov., AJ, OA, survival, ADE, standard errors and the
-Cross-view MEt3R floors; see the [toolkit README](https://github.com/vpm-project/VPM/tree/main/vp-worldbench).
+The toolkit also reports SSIM, LPIPS, δ mov., AJ, OA, survival, ADE, standard errors and the Cross-view MEt3R floors;
+see the [toolkit README](https://github.com/vpm-project/VPM/tree/main/vp-worldbench).
 
 **Further tasks on the same data**, each with input export, baselines and an evaluator in the toolkit: