Datasets:

mteb
/

gym-runs

qid string	query string	model_a string	model_b string	score_a float64	raw list	parsed_ok list	task string	judge string	query_set string	probabilities list	doc_chars int64
00001	The appellant before us was examined as prime witness in the trial of T.R. on the file of the Special Judge against the first respondent. The trial ended in conviction against the first respondent and when the appeal filed by him came to be heard by the High Court the appellant had become a Cabinet Minister. On account...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5	0.518204	[ "B", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.3778966490724218, "System B": 0.5994413661796095, "Tie": 0.02266198474796865 }, { "System A": 0.32429014942790585, "System B": 0.6186502228156204, "Tie": 0.057059627756473684 } ]	null
00009	The four appellants, along with P1 son of P2, were jointly tried in the court of Additional Sessions Judge on the following charges: "That you all accused nos. 1 to 5 on or about 12th day of November, 1967 at about 5-45 a.m. near XYZ Road, formed an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of such asse...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5	0.751668	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.7111798071201176, "System B": 0.19247144973579614, "Tie": 0.09634874314408619 }, { "System A": 0.23012600222133925, "System B": 0.7180881489242296, "Tie": 0.051785848854431195 } ]	null
00011	The petitioner has been under detention pursuant to the order dated June 5, 1990 passed by the District Magistrate with a view to preventing him "from doing any such work which is prejudicial for the maintenance of public order". The grounds of detention were furnished to the detenu in time. Therein it was stated inter...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5	0.617776	[ "B", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.4786959942685317, "System B": 0.4936798281908776, "Tie": 0.02762417754059084 }, { "System A": 0.2399357791060857, "System B": 0.7260237075235167, "Tie": 0.03404051337039759 } ]	null
00021	Assailing the legal acceptability of the judgment and order passed by the High Court where it has given endorsement to the judgment passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge wherein the learned trial Judge had found the appellants guilty of the offences and imposed the sentence of rigorous imprisonment of seven y...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5	0.40471	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.36516072088988655, "System B": 0.597329536618864, "Tie": 0.03750974249124944 }, { "System A": 0.48285431912107074, "System B": 0.3338642333325333, "Tie": 0.18328144754639605 } ]	null
00031	On 9th May, 2004, the marriage of the daughter of one P1, the brother of P2 PW.1, was to be solemnized in village Janephal, District Aurangabad. P2 PW.1, arranged a water tanker on the 6th May, 2004. As the tanker was being taken towards P2's house the accused appellants, obstructed the way by putting stones and thorny...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5	0.630182	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.524679181749556, "System B": 0.3857982169975043, "Tie": 0.08952260125293982 }, { "System A": 0.27223876479736575, "System B": 0.6540840252421859, "Tie": 0.07367720996044837 } ]	null
00032	This is an appeal by special leave from the judgment and order of the High Court dated March 27, 1958, whereby the said High Court maintained the conviction of the appellant but reduced the sentence of four years' rigorous imprisonment passed on the appellant by the Special Judge, Kanpur, to two years' rigorous impriso...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5	0.479306	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.4470715941496971, "System B": 0.4754654422577275, "Tie": 0.07746296359257546 }, { "System A": 0.4700737202214818, "System B": 0.41569050466003904, "Tie": 0.11423577511847924 } ]	null
q1	Can a preventive detention order be set aside solely on the ground of unexplained and inordinate delay when the detenu claims the underlying confession was coerced and no prosecution has yet been launched?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5	0.751964	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.5778926657652025, "System B": 0.41205697971334887, "Tie": 0.010050354521448706 }, { "System A": 0.0760286610723104, "System B": 0.9180498523852123, "Tie": 0.005921486542477177 } ]	null
q9	An appeal against a murder conviction is being considered where the trial court had acquitted the accused, but the High Court reversed the acquittal based on circumstantial evidence such as the accused being last seen with the deceased and recovery of articles at their instance, without any direct eye-witness. What leg...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5	0.775299	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.7528008481997933, "System B": 0.19455059492117224, "Tie": 0.05264855687903446 }, { "System A": 0.20573189844306838, "System B": 0.748678169450208, "Tie": 0.04558993210672349 } ]	null
q11	Can an accused be discharged at the stage of framing of charges when the prosecution case rests entirely on circumstantial evidence and the material does not establish a prima facie case?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5	0.903434	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.8820579404549895, "System B": 0.10566772008231781, "Tie": 0.01227433946269254 }, { "System A": 0.07818814011157757, "System B": 0.9155319895022294, "Tie": 0.006279870386193012 } ]	null
q21	An arbitration award that partitions immovable property of a dissolved partnership firm among its erstwhile partners is sought to be enforced as a decree. The award has not been registered as required under the Registration Act. Does the lack of registration render the award invalid and incapable of being made a rule o...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5	0.670753	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.6453177992068765, "System B": 0.0901571638604976, "Tie": 0.26452503693262597 }, { "System A": 0.31752703559756235, "System B": 0.44537843644648356, "Tie": 0.23709452795595418 } ]	null
q31	When a criminal appeal is admitted for hearing but the appellant's counsel fails to appear on the date fixed, can the appellate court dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution, or is it required to decide the appeal on merits after perusing the record?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5	0.563611	[ "A", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.5265733285566309, "System B": 0.23671434609046282, "Tie": 0.2367123253529064 }, { "System A": 0.4021144372530044, "System B": 0.36669930713129306, "Tie": 0.2311862556157026 } ]	null
q32	Can an FIR alleging cheating be quashed during investigation merely because the underlying dispute appears to be a commercial transaction, even if the complaint does not explicitly state the accused's dishonest intention?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5	0.513125	[ "A", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.5313016767109172, "System B": 0.27010464191322825, "Tie": 0.19859368137585448 }, { "System A": 0.5370537437918353, "System B": 0.32835705974437557, "Tie": 0.13458919646378908 } ]	null
q55	In a criminal appeal, the appellant challenges a murder conviction arguing that the dying declaration was recorded without a medical fitness certificate and the victim had severe burn injuries. What is the evidentiary value of such a dying declaration when corroborated by eyewitnesses?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5	0.827519	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.7825080146086846, "System B": 0.10123360025771838, "Tie": 0.11625838513359707 }, { "System A": 0.1532158228812491, "System B": 0.7820172862784811, "Tie": 0.0647668908402698 } ]	null
q67	A person charged with murder claims that the killing occurred during a sudden land dispute without premeditation, and that he used an agricultural tool against an unarmed victim. He seeks to have the offense reduced to culpable homicide not amounting to murder. What factors must be established for such an exception to ...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5	0.205792	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.10560177294909787, "System B": 0.854925650548253, "Tie": 0.03947257650264918 }, { "System A": 0.6592183934465662, "System B": 0.23170996233624852, "Tie": 0.10907164421718529 } ]	null
q83	A public servant was dismissed from service after a domestic inquiry in which the main witnesses were never produced and their earlier statements were admitted into evidence. The employee challenges the dismissal, contending that the finding of misconduct is perverse and not supported by any legal evidence, and seeks j...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5	0.673003	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.5681916770875298, "System B": 0.20595226608605668, "Tie": 0.22585605682641352 }, { "System A": 0.2547907745253932, "System B": 0.5845650742726111, "Tie": 0.1606441512019957 } ]	null
q85	Can a preventive detention order be quashed if the government fails to promptly decide the detenu's representation?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5	0.972565	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.9679122103245144, "System B": 0.0177642723870329, "Tie": 0.014323517288452749 }, { "System A": 0.02189401048329435, "System B": 0.9620073936598954, "Tie": 0.016098595856810286 } ]	null
q90	A dispute arises over compensation for compulsory acquisition of agricultural land on the outskirts of a city, where the land has potential for residential development. The landowner argues that the market value should reflect sale instances of nearby small building plots and the land's potential for housing, while the...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5	0.494815	[ "B", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.3096311540718468, "System B": 0.4762796530383782, "Tie": 0.2140891928897749 }, { "System A": 0.3623736087838956, "System B": 0.5082823608575904, "Tie": 0.12934403035851405 } ]	null
q98	In a murder trial where the prosecution's case is based entirely on circumstantial evidence, and the circumstances are that the accused were last seen with the victim, bore some possible motive, and certain ordinary articles were recovered at their instance but not clearly connected to the crime, can such evidence supp...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5	0.964937	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.9386261262098997, "System B": 0.031866169379366066, "Tie": 0.02950770441073433 }, { "System A": 0.018382037357563604, "System B": 0.9713697129542915, "Tie": 0.01024824968814491 } ]	null
00011	The petitioner has been under detention pursuant to the order dated June 5, 1990 passed by the District Magistrate with a view to preventing him "from doing any such work which is prejudicial for the maintenance of public order". The grounds of detention were furnished to the detenu in time. Therein it was stated inter...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5	0.606943	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.5011239228437586, "System B": 0.4712613798349821, "Tie": 0.027614697321259207 }, { "System A": 0.27635599827725565, "System B": 0.6742650215250404, "Tie": 0.049378980197703974 } ]	null
00026	Appellant before us was detained. He is the Managing Director of a company, registered and incorporated as CompanyC1. It was an exporter and held a valid licence therefor. The company was to export products of alloy steel. Upon exporting of alloy steel, it was entitled to credits under the Duty Entitlement Pass Book (D...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5	0.589132	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.5625918887180509, "System B": 0.42659537369774614, "Tie": 0.01081273758420301 }, { "System A": 0.37616914560453296, "System B": 0.5967011009737309, "Tie": 0.027129753421736243 } ]	null
00036	Appellants call in question legality of the judgment rendered by the High Court upholding conviction of the appellants (hereinafter referred to as the 'accused') and sentence as imposed by the trial Court which had sentenced each to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months, two years and seven years respectively ...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5	0.233909	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.22339552043368371, "System B": 0.7413087213467144, "Tie": 0.03529575821960192 }, { "System A": 0.7535518090252209, "System B": 0.20709909506004923, "Tie": 0.03934909591472988 } ]	null
00039	Having been selected by the Public Service Commission, the respondent herein was appointed as Law Officer-cum-Draftsman in the Directorate of Cooperation. There was only one post in the same Cadre and it had no promotional avenues. He filed a representation that his post be upgraded or two promotional avenues be provid...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5	0.569278	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.4945760089500164, "System B": 0.31183005568499955, "Tie": 0.19359393536498398 }, { "System A": 0.3927187471056449, "System B": 0.487085241573664, "Tie": 0.1201960113206911 } ]	null
q11	Can an accused be discharged at the stage of framing of charges when the prosecution case rests entirely on circumstantial evidence and the material does not establish a prima facie case?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5	0.898117	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.8982521949192755, "System B": 0.0922703290086944, "Tie": 0.009477476072030144 }, { "System A": 0.1033580959119916, "System B": 0.8898445749183227, "Tie": 0.006797329169685739 } ]	null
q26	Under what circumstances can a High Court in appeal overturn a trial court's acquittal when the evidence admits two reasonable views?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5	0.522737	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.4614251350578953, "System B": 0.3837008817280762, "Tie": 0.15487398321402845 }, { "System A": 0.42248568755521715, "System B": 0.43571006263395307, "Tie": 0.14180424981082984 } ]	null
q36	In a murder trial based solely on circumstantial evidence, can the accused be convicted when stolen articles of the deceased are recovered pursuant to his disclosure statement and he offers no plausible explanation for possession?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5	0.933308	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.9025712988017226, "System B": 0.0681682780222102, "Tie": 0.029260423176067158 }, { "System A": 0.04350573451653314, "System B": 0.9423341316637528, "Tie": 0.014160133819714153 } ]	null
q39	When multiple accused act with a common intention to cause grievous hurt, and one of them causes a fatal injury, but the exact identity of that person is not established, can the others be convicted for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5	0.207165	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.22592495413005514, "System B": 0.7269969453606169, "Tie": 0.0470781005093279 }, { "System A": 0.8056329550445182, "System B": 0.13536350993458568, "Tie": 0.05900353502089616 } ]	null
q50	A government employee is accused of forging signatures in official payment registers and misappropriating a small amount of money. The magistrate dismissed the complaint for lack of prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC, holding the acts were connected to official duty. Is sanction really required when the alleged wron...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5	0.599873	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.5680631425804878, "System B": 0.16859800251130605, "Tie": 0.263338854908206 }, { "System A": 0.4011152136664519, "System B": 0.40114227385371387, "Tie": 0.1977425124798342 } ]	null
q63	A trial court acquitted the accused despite eyewitness testimony; the High Court reversed and convicted. The accused claims the High Court overstepped its powers in an appeal against acquittal. What principles govern appellate interference with acquittals?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5	0.531043	[ "A", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.5161632672273512, "System B": 0.3795364388423001, "Tie": 0.10430029393034869 }, { "System A": 0.4121537738532728, "System B": 0.39969828694771736, "Tie": 0.1881479391990099 } ]	null
q69	When is prior sanction required under Section 197 CrPC before prosecuting a public servant for alleged forgery or misappropriation committed during official duty?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5	0.49217	[ "A", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.40294276782626204, "System B": 0.3350695326787201, "Tie": 0.2619876994950178 }, { "System A": 0.45491430127871085, "System B": 0.35572020260995574, "Tie": 0.1893654961113334 } ]	null
q60	A person is convicted for murder based solely on his identification at a test identification parade conducted about four months after the offence, where the eyewitnesses did not describe his features in the FIR or during investigation. Is it safe to uphold such a conviction?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-small-en-v1.5	0.312034	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.28432734356838224, "System B": 0.6325742755654999, "Tie": 0.08309838086611775 }, { "System A": 0.612328711172455, "System B": 0.20871022297413053, "Tie": 0.17896106585341448 } ]	null
q68	A preventive detention order is challenged before it is executed on grounds of unexplained delay, non-consideration of a favourable report, and malafide purpose. What are the limited grounds for judicial intervention at the pre-execution stage?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-small-en-v1.5	0.794313	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.7369302633187179, "System B": 0.2290427988159488, "Tie": 0.03402693786533331 }, { "System A": 0.1570016128525012, "System B": 0.8263673079313972, "Tie": 0.016631079216101498 } ]	null
q75	Can a Magistrate continue proceedings under Section 145 of the Criminal Procedure Code when a civil suit involving possession of the same property is already pending and an interim order of status quo has been granted?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-small-en-v1.5	0.537899	[ "A", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.5485393386405687, "System B": 0.035524436105340784, "Tie": 0.4159362252540905 }, { "System A": 0.4584250975422289, "System B": 0.09700742879125952, "Tie": 0.44456747366651156 } ]	null
q80	A private citizen who is not the complainant seeks special leave to appeal against a high court acquittal in a criminal case. Is such a third-party petition maintainable under Article 136, and does it satisfy the fair procedure requirement of Article 21?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-small-en-v1.5	0.620564	[ "A", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.6380422368712056, "System B": 0.0838230617317895, "Tie": 0.27813470139700486 }, { "System A": 0.37165418903259717, "System B": 0.299691406551813, "Tie": 0.32865440441558985 } ]	null
q84	In a prosecution for cheque dishonour, the drawer claims that the cheque was a blank signed leaf misused by a former associate and denies any enforceable debt. What is the scope of the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and what is the effect of the drawer not stepping into the witness box...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-small-en-v1.5	0.674695	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.5757207982629808, "System B": 0.2023612293101514, "Tie": 0.2219179724268677 }, { "System A": 0.2382371357381817, "System B": 0.5636570140355261, "Tie": 0.19810585022629212 } ]	null
q92	What is the evidentiary value of a witness identifying the accused for the first time in court when no test identification parade was held during investigation, and can a conviction be sustained solely on such identification?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	BAAI/bge-small-en-v1.5	0.743624	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.7740198186985962, "System B": 0.21272431170197642, "Tie": 0.013255869599427495 }, { "System A": 0.28697551896711704, "System B": 0.7001750171157506, "Tie": 0.012849463917132395 } ]	null
q27	Under what circumstances can a manufacturer accused of selling adulterated food challenge a magistrate's summoning order through a writ petition before the High Court instead of seeking discharge under the Criminal Procedure Code?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	IEITYuan/Yuan-embedding-2.0-en	0.421415	[ "A", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.39556682276138755, "System B": 0.2652267929272749, "Tie": 0.3392063843113376 }, { "System A": 0.5451234730032322, "System B": 0.1004449608814909, "Tie": 0.3544315661152769 } ]	null
q31	When a criminal appeal is admitted for hearing but the appellant's counsel fails to appear on the date fixed, can the appellate court dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution, or is it required to decide the appeal on merits after perusing the record?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	IEITYuan/Yuan-embedding-2.0-en	0.505843	[ "tie", "tie" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.44511519645085235, "System B": 0.035750809150889164, "Tie": 0.5191339943982584 }, { "System A": 0.4475685563996315, "System B": 0.061575524721748445, "Tie": 0.4908559188786201 } ]	null
q36	In a murder trial based solely on circumstantial evidence, can the accused be convicted when stolen articles of the deceased are recovered pursuant to his disclosure statement and he offers no plausible explanation for possession?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	IEITYuan/Yuan-embedding-2.0-en	0.531886	[ "B", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.28357577525495603, "System B": 0.6709259027220672, "Tie": 0.045498322022976725 }, { "System A": 0.2220925178149313, "System B": 0.7369848565167784, "Tie": 0.04092262566829033 } ]	null
q39	When multiple accused act with a common intention to cause grievous hurt, and one of them causes a fatal injury, but the exact identity of that person is not established, can the others be convicted for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	IEITYuan/Yuan-embedding-2.0-en	0.37908	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.24744220939571218, "System B": 0.7040718438695557, "Tie": 0.0484859467347321 }, { "System A": 0.45395799185935704, "System B": 0.42690612018029434, "Tie": 0.11913588796034866 } ]	null
q44	Under Indian Penal Code, what distinguishes murder from culpable homicide not amounting to murder when the accused inflicts a bodily injury that is sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death but did not intend to kill?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	IEITYuan/Yuan-embedding-2.0-en	0.177668	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.06397459972148874, "System B": 0.9009028951014117, "Tie": 0.03512250517709958 }, { "System A": 0.665796120746538, "System B": 0.21339672541987884, "Tie": 0.12080715383358318 } ]	null
q57	Under what circumstances can criminal proceedings be quashed at the initial stage when the charge sheet and material on record fail to disclose a prima facie offence?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	IEITYuan/Yuan-embedding-2.0-en	0.688158	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.6326251869888647, "System B": 0.09995356592316608, "Tie": 0.26742124708796927 }, { "System A": 0.3202247277572977, "System B": 0.5401832536217963, "Tie": 0.13959201862090595 } ]	null
q80	A private citizen who is not the complainant seeks special leave to appeal against a high court acquittal in a criminal case. Is such a third-party petition maintainable under Article 136, and does it satisfy the fair procedure requirement of Article 21?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	IEITYuan/Yuan-embedding-2.0-en	0.397888	[ "A", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.4805111576213314, "System B": 0.34262069701147696, "Tie": 0.17686814536719167 }, { "System A": 0.6846953321774003, "System B": 0.1383564784177528, "Tie": 0.1769481894048469 } ]	null
q87	An accused person was acquitted by the High Court in a murder case. Now the victim’s brother, who was not a party to the original trial, wants to challenge the acquittal by filing a special leave petition before the Supreme Court. Is such a petition maintainable, and does it violate the accused’s right to a fair proced...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	IEITYuan/Yuan-embedding-2.0-en	0.505169	[ "A", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.5258342103124876, "System B": 0.0629932556375187, "Tie": 0.4111725340499937 }, { "System A": 0.5784892577376262, "System B": 0.13632606549096046, "Tie": 0.2851846767714134 } ]	null
00027	Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of the High Court dismissing the appeal filed by the appellants. The appeal was directed against the judgment dated 31.8.2004 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge convicting the appellants for offence and sentencing each to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fi...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	IEITYuan/Yuan-embedding-2.0-en	0.503349	[ "A", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.5897586771573868, "System B": 0.3496606082578922, "Tie": 0.060580714584720904 }, { "System A": 0.5833877861381148, "System B": 0.35668592128454224, "Tie": 0.05992629257734297 } ]	null
00031	On 9th May, 2004, the marriage of the daughter of one P1, the brother of P2 PW.1, was to be solemnized in village Janephal, District Aurangabad. P2 PW.1, arranged a water tanker on the 6th May, 2004. As the tanker was being taken towards P2's house the accused appellants, obstructed the way by putting stones and thorny...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	IEITYuan/Yuan-embedding-2.0-en	0.325287	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.18680104798730757, "System B": 0.745489822329357, "Tie": 0.06770912968333542 }, { "System A": 0.5295166467229047, "System B": 0.3893552198793084, "Tie": 0.08112813339778696 } ]	null
00036	Appellants call in question legality of the judgment rendered by the High Court upholding conviction of the appellants (hereinafter referred to as the 'accused') and sentence as imposed by the trial Court which had sentenced each to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months, two years and seven years respectively ...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	IEITYuan/Yuan-embedding-2.0-en	0.366783	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.29407906334047273, "System B": 0.6344548021528286, "Tie": 0.07146613450669868 }, { "System A": 0.5351057372053365, "System B": 0.34261208645337027, "Tie": 0.12228217634129326 } ]	null
00039	Having been selected by the Public Service Commission, the respondent herein was appointed as Law Officer-cum-Draftsman in the Directorate of Cooperation. There was only one post in the same Cadre and it had no promotional avenues. He filed a representation that his post be upgraded or two promotional avenues be provid...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	IEITYuan/Yuan-embedding-2.0-en	0.234551	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.06042120342833413, "System B": 0.9048410441153859, "Tie": 0.03473775245628005 }, { "System A": 0.5462706223902712, "System B": 0.32889580560195514, "Tie": 0.12483357200777365 } ]	null
00044	The appellants were tried for offences on the allegations that about four months prior to the incident, some quarrel had taken place between the deceased P1 and the appellant No. 4 P2 in relation to raising of boundary wall. On 12 April 1983 at about 7.00 P.M. the deceased accompanied by P3, had gone to P4 (PW-8) to en...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	IEITYuan/Yuan-embedding-2.0-en	0.319433	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.24257177499396992, "System B": 0.6796813262223966, "Tie": 0.07774689878363335 }, { "System A": 0.5994009231194434, "System B": 0.3142422572413547, "Tie": 0.08635681963920203 } ]	null
q14	What are the requirements for a valid sanction to prosecute a public servant under the Prevention of Corruption Act, and what is the consequence if the sanction order does not disclose the facts or materials considered by the sanctioning authority?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Linq-AI-Research/Linq-Embed-Mistral	0.341347	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.22729917007611916, "System B": 0.6271692598018908, "Tie": 0.14553157012199006 }, { "System A": 0.5110121768502457, "System B": 0.27627064659862205, "Tie": 0.21271717655113218 } ]	null
q16	A public officer involved in evaluating tenders is accused of conspiring to fabricate a performance report to reject a bidder's application. The bidder files a criminal complaint for cheating and defamation after losing civil remedies. The officer seeks quashing of the complaint on the ground that no prosecution can be...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Linq-AI-Research/Linq-Embed-Mistral	0.206762	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.17680049846673454, "System B": 0.7276159314949098, "Tie": 0.09558357003835569 }, { "System A": 0.752527688959366, "System B": 0.13038967730072953, "Tie": 0.11708263373990464 } ]	null
q19	Whether previous sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act is required for prosecuting a person who has ceased to hold the public office alleged to have been misused but continues in another public capacity at the time of taking cognizance?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Linq-AI-Research/Linq-Embed-Mistral	0.501594	[ "B", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.39058748685001854, "System B": 0.4417461660579279, "Tie": 0.16766634709205355 }, { "System A": 0.34597551915149216, "System B": 0.40351169294251843, "Tie": 0.25051278790598946 } ]	null
q30	A criminal appeal where the High Court reverses a trial court's acquittal in a murder case, relying on a re-evaluation of evidence, but the defence contends that the appellate court failed to give due weight to the trial court's credibility findings and that forensic evidence (including ballistic reports) contradicts t...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Linq-AI-Research/Linq-Embed-Mistral	0.523059	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.4508588636608665, "System B": 0.4111507013970228, "Tie": 0.13799043494211063 }, { "System A": 0.4010514925661803, "System B": 0.4535807346561218, "Tie": 0.14536777277769786 } ]	null
q41	Whether delay in holding a test identification parade by itself makes the identification evidence unreliable if the witnesses had a clear and enduring memory of the accused due to the nature of the crime?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Linq-AI-Research/Linq-Embed-Mistral	0.25129	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.09719934252269458, "System B": 0.8629572505509142, "Tie": 0.03984340692639114 }, { "System A": 0.5626996894568899, "System B": 0.3336176307701887, "Tie": 0.10368267977292144 } ]	null
q49	In an appeal against acquittal, what is the scope of the appellate court's power to re-appreciate evidence and reverse the trial court's finding?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Linq-AI-Research/Linq-Embed-Mistral	0.221863	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.19972300649632577, "System B": 0.7047991189365205, "Tie": 0.09547787456715374 }, { "System A": 0.723565364463669, "System B": 0.1160934531999234, "Tie": 0.1603411823364075 } ]	null
q54	An Appellate court's judgment in a criminal appeal is challenged because it simply states that no error was found after a review of the record, without discussing the testimony of any witnesses or the evidence in detail. The accused also raises a separate argument that the criminal proceedings against some co-accused s...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Linq-AI-Research/Linq-Embed-Mistral	0.375341	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.3678713421018316, "System B": 0.45626724686890574, "Tie": 0.17586141102926264 }, { "System A": 0.6127770825580285, "System B": 0.20253744260685602, "Tie": 0.18468547483511544 } ]	null
q55	In a criminal appeal, the appellant challenges a murder conviction arguing that the dying declaration was recorded without a medical fitness certificate and the victim had severe burn injuries. What is the evidentiary value of such a dying declaration when corroborated by eyewitnesses?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Linq-AI-Research/Linq-Embed-Mistral	0.357067	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.33227160376570136, "System B": 0.543529584089976, "Tie": 0.12419881214432266 }, { "System A": 0.5923365601913938, "System B": 0.23186273211322186, "Tie": 0.1758007076953843 } ]	null
q81	Is compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act required when narcotics are recovered from the tool box of a scooter rather than from the person of the accused, and does the 2001 amendment apply to appeals that were already pending when it came into force?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Linq-AI-Research/Linq-Embed-Mistral	0.459642	[ "A", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.4631490419568603, "System B": 0.12728750623274634, "Tie": 0.40956345181039344 }, { "System A": 0.564977297733447, "System B": 0.06768246033561097, "Tie": 0.3673402419309421 } ]	null
q84	In a prosecution for cheque dishonour, the drawer claims that the cheque was a blank signed leaf misused by a former associate and denies any enforceable debt. What is the scope of the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and what is the effect of the drawer not stepping into the witness box...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Linq-AI-Research/Linq-Embed-Mistral	0.510424	[ "A", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.5416710701036916, "System B": 0.2589488404878519, "Tie": 0.1993800894084565 }, { "System A": 0.506638484080121, "System B": 0.265610569990647, "Tie": 0.22775094592923192 } ]	null
q99	Can a permanent employee of a government-owned company challenge a service rule that allows termination without assigning any reason, claiming that the company is 'State' under Article 12 and that the rule is an unconscionable term void as opposed to public policy?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Linq-AI-Research/Linq-Embed-Mistral	0.25484	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.28088550721342814, "System B": 0.552582389188076, "Tie": 0.1665321035984959 }, { "System A": 0.7901057987923231, "System B": 0.08116128838596778, "Tie": 0.12873291282170907 } ]	null
00014	The appellants are five in number and they have filed this appeal as of right. They were acquitted by the trial court but convicted by the High Court on appeal filed by the State, besides the offence of rioting. On the first count they were each sentenced to imprisonment for life besides fine and to lesser sentences fo...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Linq-AI-Research/Linq-Embed-Mistral	0.263778	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.12609385073367604, "System B": 0.8488153671233167, "Tie": 0.02509078214300719 }, { "System A": 0.6012618294626809, "System B": 0.3790954400733194, "Tie": 0.01964273046399974 } ]	null
00016	facts of the matter, as is evident from the present Writ Petition challenging an order of detention dated 1st March, 2001 it appears that the petitioner is presently confined in Central Prison and it is this detention which the petitioner contended is without the authority of law and constitute an infringement of his g...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Linq-AI-Research/Linq-Embed-Mistral	0.179108	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.09634986464382594, "System B": 0.8554153730614709, "Tie": 0.04823476229470322 }, { "System A": 0.6830024601730305, "System B": 0.15849944643729796, "Tie": 0.1584980933896717 } ]	null
00019	This appeal by special leave is directed against the Judgment rendered by a High Court confirming the conviction of the appellant for the offences punishable. The High Court by the impugned judgment confirmed the judgment passed by the Principal Sessions Judge convicting the appellant and sentencing him to suffer impri...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Linq-AI-Research/Linq-Embed-Mistral	0.388826	[ "A", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.5511773755328914, "System B": 0.37529003917557674, "Tie": 0.07353258529153187 }, { "System A": 0.7808062290733213, "System B": 0.16022251603020746, "Tie": 0.058971254896471245 } ]	null
00030	This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 26.5.2006 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court whereby the learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition and set aside the impugned order passed by the Revisional Court and remanded the matter back to the Revisional Court...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Linq-AI-Research/Linq-Embed-Mistral	0.078991	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.016576353399622396, "System B": 0.9754992976094459, "Tie": 0.00792434899093162 }, { "System A": 0.8204186866642235, "System B": 0.09530692752031661, "Tie": 0.08427438581545992 } ]	null
00041	This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 23.8.2016, passed by the High Court wherein High Court has dismissed the petition filed by the appellant. Records reveal that the parents of the appellant, namely, P1 and P2, entered into an agreement to sell dated 14.1.1997 with Respondent No.2 herein. The sale consideratio...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Linq-AI-Research/Linq-Embed-Mistral	0.137252	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.07066197924988245, "System B": 0.9073759991155472, "Tie": 0.021962021634570252 }, { "System A": 0.7759766523200163, "System B": 0.16169891176926815, "Tie": 0.062324435910715556 } ]	null
00049	A peculiar feature of this appeal by special leave is that it is not an appeal against conviction or against acquittal but one preferred by a prosecution witness for expunction of several highly derogatory remarks made against him by a learned Judge of the High Court while allowing a Criminal Appeal at the High Court. ...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Linq-AI-Research/Linq-Embed-Mistral	0.079674	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.03503392975435502, "System B": 0.9411120928959091, "Tie": 0.02385397734973592 }, { "System A": 0.8609907199774617, "System B": 0.08576417482697819, "Tie": 0.053245105195560215 } ]	null
q26	Under what circumstances can a High Court in appeal overturn a trial court's acquittal when the evidence admits two reasonable views?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B	0.144507	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.005161586714154373, "System B": 0.9925181073999261, "Tie": 0.0023203058859194528 }, { "System A": 0.6541916036537734, "System B": 0.2195765370653023, "Tie": 0.12623185928092429 } ]	null
q35	May a relative of the deceased, who was not the complainant, file an appeal to the Supreme Court against the acquittal of the accused?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B	0.428767	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.3283302863794656, "System B": 0.5370824122360504, "Tie": 0.13458730138448402 }, { "System A": 0.452256364419879, "System B": 0.3760765346544649, "Tie": 0.1716671009256561 } ]	null
q59	Is a prosecution against a public servant invalid when the sanction order merely refers to a note without disclosing the facts constituting the offence or showing that the sanctioning authority applied its mind?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B	0.565447	[ "A", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.5620512290756212, "System B": 0.2605541018266692, "Tie": 0.17739466909770968 }, { "System A": 0.4508588636608665, "System B": 0.4111507013970228, "Tie": 0.13799043494211063 } ]	null
q76	In an appeal against acquittal, can the High Court overturn the acquittal merely because it takes a different view of the evidence, particularly when the lower appellate court found the prosecution witnesses interested, there was unexplained delay in lodging the complaint, and a material witness was not examined?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B	0.065508	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.001538661133621053, "System B": 0.9969460674596686, "Tie": 0.0015152714067103279 }, { "System A": 0.8548696476226656, "System B": 0.11230884061977633, "Tie": 0.03282151175755811 } ]	null
00026	Appellant before us was detained. He is the Managing Director of a company, registered and incorporated as CompanyC1. It was an exporter and held a valid licence therefor. The company was to export products of alloy steel. Upon exporting of alloy steel, it was entitled to credits under the Duty Entitlement Pass Book (D...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B	0.136334	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.09246216483487406, "System B": 0.8729766741815471, "Tie": 0.03456116098357895 }, { "System A": 0.7917858420998485, "System B": 0.11763781695734712, "Tie": 0.0905763409428043 } ]	null
00035	Interpretation and/or application of Medical Benefit Rules applicable in the State S1 as also in the State S2 is in question before us in these appeals which arise out of the judgment and order dated 20th June, 2005 passed by S1 High Court in Writ Petition No. 10942 and that of the judgment and order dated 4th August, ...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B	0.0375	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.01946188298658677, "System B": 0.9670815291800495, "Tie": 0.013456587833363794 }, { "System A": 0.9269873125634401, "System B": 0.024607113429913716, "Tie": 0.0484055740066461 } ]	null
00008	The complainant P1 filed a Special Leave Petition in this court seeking leave to appeal against the judgment dated 6th April, 1993 of the High Court. The incident for which these accused were charged is the murder of P2, son of the complainant P1 (appellant) on 13th June, 1982. As per the case of the prosecution, the ...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-4B	0.675365	[ "A", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.6520849722538657, "System B": 0.24002364776322987, "Tie": 0.10789137998290434 }, { "System A": 0.30876983911253386, "System B": 0.5981697327409675, "Tie": 0.09306042814649856 } ]	null
00009	The four appellants, along with P1 son of P2, were jointly tried in the court of Additional Sessions Judge on the following charges: "That you all accused nos. 1 to 5 on or about 12th day of November, 1967 at about 5-45 a.m. near XYZ Road, formed an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of such asse...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-4B	0.452287	[ "B", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.33505047099849916, "System B": 0.53971199766657, "Tie": 0.12523753133493087 }, { "System A": 0.44111975727582803, "System B": 0.4549274040120126, "Tie": 0.10395283871215932 } ]	null
00046	Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of the High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for offences punishable and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and also to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- with default stipulations, as recorded by the Principal Sessions Judge. The prosecution version, in a n...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-4B	0.472862	[ "A", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.42726965058144306, "System B": 0.4080345197340122, "Tie": 0.1646958296845448 }, { "System A": 0.5286312077668597, "System B": 0.4008440792480248, "Tie": 0.07052471298511558 } ]	null
00049	A peculiar feature of this appeal by special leave is that it is not an appeal against conviction or against acquittal but one preferred by a prosecution witness for expunction of several highly derogatory remarks made against him by a learned Judge of the High Court while allowing a Criminal Appeal at the High Court. ...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-4B	0.117548	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.024361572290486164, "System B": 0.9611948776639829, "Tie": 0.014443550045530943 }, { "System A": 0.7320815033802397, "System B": 0.13910701192414385, "Tie": 0.12881148469561646 } ]	null
q8	In a preventive detention matter, if the detention order is issued by a senior bureaucrat on behalf of the state government but the detenu's representation is later decided by the state minister, is the detention invalid for lack of proper consideration?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-4B	0.343175	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.26834269668399774, "System B": 0.5700962923952217, "Tie": 0.16156101092078046 }, { "System A": 0.5771291143071973, "System B": 0.25158363517673016, "Tie": 0.17128725051607258 } ]	null
q9	An appeal against a murder conviction is being considered where the trial court had acquitted the accused, but the High Court reversed the acquittal based on circumstantial evidence such as the accused being last seen with the deceased and recovery of articles at their instance, without any direct eye-witness. What leg...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-4B	0.514346	[ "B", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.35433965221528413, "System B": 0.5285436265676049, "Tie": 0.11711672121711109 }, { "System A": 0.33715727677629453, "System B": 0.5687465341715349, "Tie": 0.09409618905217051 } ]	null
q46	A government servant officiating in a higher post is reverted to his substantive lower post on grounds of unsatisfactory performance, without being given a chance to show cause. Does this reversion amount to a 'reduction in rank' requiring the protection of Article 311 of the Constitution?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-4B	0.407571	[ "A", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.4049502640040641, "System B": 0.22576751224910513, "Tie": 0.36928222374683073 }, { "System A": 0.6056263343124604, "System B": 0.05672828106254801, "Tie": 0.33764538462499166 } ]	null
q49	In an appeal against acquittal, what is the scope of the appellate court's power to re-appreciate evidence and reverse the trial court's finding?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-4B	0.237116	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.12876701056580628, "System B": 0.8151010127984487, "Tie": 0.05613197663574496 }, { "System A": 0.6326242825731103, "System B": 0.2674231476628582, "Tie": 0.09995256976403147 } ]	null
q56	A married woman died of burn injuries at her matrimonial home. The prosecution's case depends entirely on a dying declaration, but the medical evidence suggests she was so severely burned that she could not have made it. Can the accused be given the benefit of the doubt, and would the High Court’s acquittal be set asid...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-4B	0.479941	[ "A", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.5358736082958903, "System B": 0.28971158607523334, "Tie": 0.17441480562887637 }, { "System A": 0.5786415165643349, "System B": 0.2522429403262962, "Tie": 0.16911554310936883 } ]	null
q66	Can a court award compensation to an injured victim under Section 357 CrPC while releasing the accused on probation for offences committed during a sudden fight where no murderous intent was established?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-4B	0.448833	[ "A", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.42064686603055285, "System B": 0.3719818839085859, "Tie": 0.20737125006086118 }, { "System A": 0.49965910376001926, "System B": 0.24632494818369732, "Tie": 0.25401594805628336 } ]	null
q68	A preventive detention order is challenged before it is executed on grounds of unexplained delay, non-consideration of a favourable report, and malafide purpose. What are the limited grounds for judicial intervention at the pre-execution stage?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-4B	0.20112	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.1562749539286215, "System B": 0.7734742185558977, "Tie": 0.07025082751548072 }, { "System A": 0.7305529489587289, "System B": 0.15223346572470023, "Tie": 0.11721358531657089 } ]	null
00001	The appellant before us was examined as prime witness in the trial of T.R. on the file of the Special Judge against the first respondent. The trial ended in conviction against the first respondent and when the appeal filed by him came to be heard by the High Court the appellant had become a Cabinet Minister. On account...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B	0.15638	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.09312514084779575, "System B": 0.8792360693736619, "Tie": 0.027638789778542353 }, { "System A": 0.7317570738966148, "System B": 0.1433879836284115, "Tie": 0.12485494247497379 } ]	null
00011	The petitioner has been under detention pursuant to the order dated June 5, 1990 passed by the District Magistrate with a view to preventing him "from doing any such work which is prejudicial for the maintenance of public order". The grounds of detention were furnished to the detenu in time. Therein it was stated inter...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B	0.279002	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.174055556740331, "System B": 0.7855529701477364, "Tie": 0.04039147311193262 }, { "System A": 0.572783851282979, "System B": 0.3002879765380213, "Tie": 0.1269281721789997 } ]	null
00020	Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the High Court by which two Writ Petitions filed by the respondent were disposed of. The controversy lies within a very narrow compass. Before dealing with the rival contentions the factual background needs to be noted. Respondent was appointed on...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B	0.384873	[ "A", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.4345951021012978, "System B": 0.2913951448831334, "Tie": 0.2740097530155689 }, { "System A": 0.6546991845264782, "System B": 0.05099163198200117, "Tie": 0.2943091834915206 } ]	null
00045	In this appeal by special leave the sole appellant is P1 who alongwith six others was put up for trial before the Additional Sessions Judge in charged of the offence. It is not necessary to refer to the charges framed against the remaining accused since they are not appellants before us. The trial court by its judgment...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B	0.132626	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.0727790715166135, "System B": 0.8924287912726321, "Tie": 0.034792137210754345 }, { "System A": 0.7966340194405701, "System B": 0.14678852935598774, "Tie": 0.056577451203442035 } ]	null
q1	Can a preventive detention order be set aside solely on the ground of unexplained and inordinate delay when the detenu claims the underlying confession was coerced and no prosecution has yet been launched?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B	0.143308	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.14714750894017006, "System B": 0.7986899496448636, "Tie": 0.0541625414149663 }, { "System A": 0.8609907199774617, "System B": 0.08576417482697819, "Tie": 0.053245105195560215 } ]	null
q11	Can an accused be discharged at the stage of framing of charges when the prosecution case rests entirely on circumstantial evidence and the material does not establish a prima facie case?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B	0.295923	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.14598456698576046, "System B": 0.8426454346736438, "Tie": 0.011369998340595655 }, { "System A": 0.5487069337795178, "System B": 0.42906136948923645, "Tie": 0.022231696731245712 } ]	null
q20	Can a High Court, in its revisional jurisdiction at the instance of a private complainant, set aside an order of acquittal and direct retrial where the appellate court erroneously excluded a portion of the accused's statement that was admissible under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act as leading to discovery of sto...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B	0.176866	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.16021256814841908, "System B": 0.792963210155768, "Tie": 0.04682422169581302 }, { "System A": 0.7708407914041822, "System B": 0.11105742255870622, "Tie": 0.1181017860371116 } ]	null
q45	A party seeks to set aside an arbitration award, alleging that the arbitrator committed a legal error by incorrectly applying a legal proposition. What grounds are available for a court to interfere with an arbitral award, and what is the distinction between errors of law and mistakes of fact in this context?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B	0.242473	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.2655732660553838, "System B": 0.5908499844644908, "Tie": 0.14357674948012542 }, { "System A": 0.7943097132892907, "System B": 0.08947928152457693, "Tie": 0.11621100518613245 } ]	null
q52	When can a court disregard the evidence of eyewitnesses in a test identification parade on the ground of procedural irregularities?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B	0.231551	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.02137885870095295, "System B": 0.9687104733850854, "Tie": 0.009910667913961637 }, { "System A": 0.5231549567468414, "System B": 0.3966916138513576, "Tie": 0.08015342940180101 } ]	null
q93	Is the social impact of a crime and its consequences on victims relevant for determining the quantum of punishment?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B	0.346905	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.2684253359646188, "System B": 0.5971952973289707, "Tie": 0.13437936670641054 }, { "System A": 0.5768957449193456, "System B": 0.2932838998507451, "Tie": 0.12982035522990937 } ]	null
q96	Is unexplained delay in issuing a detention order a valid ground to quash it as the live link between the prejudicial activities and the purpose of detention is snapped?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B	0.519122	[ "A", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.5199103300920241, "System B": 0.3082483711339306, "Tie": 0.17184129877404514 }, { "System A": 0.47104308343837115, "System B": 0.33586960068793564, "Tie": 0.1930873158736932 } ]	null
q98	In a murder trial where the prosecution's case is based entirely on circumstantial evidence, and the circumstances are that the accused were last seen with the victim, bore some possible motive, and certain ordinary articles were recovered at their instance but not clearly connected to the crime, can such evidence supp...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B	0.516481	[ "A", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.5272372277657854, "System B": 0.29849976945872, "Tie": 0.1742630027754946 }, { "System A": 0.5102106180831207, "System B": 0.34739626724171163, "Tie": 0.14239311467516758 } ]	null
q5	A person detained under a state preventive detention law challenges the detention on the ground that his representation was not considered promptly because the minister was on tour, resulting in an unexplained delay of several days. Does this render the continued detention illegal under Article 22?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-l-v2.0	0.235445	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.2218668841735923, "System B": 0.5936399317974851, "Tie": 0.18449318402892262 }, { "System A": 0.7849145315947629, "System B": 0.09846954857704265, "Tie": 0.11661591982819444 } ]	null
q43	Does the reversion of an officiating government servant to a lower substantive post on grounds of unsatisfactory work amount to a reduction in rank requiring compliance with Article 311(2) of the Constitution?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-l-v2.0	0.514364	[ "A", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.5662028493318182, "System B": 0.09810536639246713, "Tie": 0.3356917842757148 }, { "System A": 0.5322808440557136, "System B": 0.12163768538778105, "Tie": 0.34608147055650534 } ]	null
q48	Under what circumstances can a High Court sitting in appeal against an order of acquittal reverse the trial court's decision and convict the accused?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-l-v2.0	0.702269	[ "B", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.47817830887092244, "System B": 0.49314593853813626, "Tie": 0.028675752590941253 }, { "System A": 0.082315319118275, "System B": 0.9063600133385855, "Tie": 0.011324667543139615 } ]	null
q57	Under what circumstances can criminal proceedings be quashed at the initial stage when the charge sheet and material on record fail to disclose a prima facie offence?	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-l-v2.0	0.179116	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-deepseek-ai_DeepSeek-V4-Flash_0e4b4485586e-673ec02d805a-1b62544ec9a8	[ { "System A": 0.18680104798730757, "System B": 0.745489822329357, "Tie": 0.06770912968333542 }, { "System A": 0.8092656791618588, "System B": 0.08441761018957239, "Tie": 0.10631671064856894 } ]	null
00005	On 19.3.1999, SI P1 along Ct. P2 went to Village V1 where Inspector P1, PW-16, had reached along with his staff. After some time, ACP, arrived at the spot. On enquiry, they came to know that one constable of Police Station, namely, P2, having suffered a gun shot injury, had been taken to the hospital. The Head Constabl...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-l-v2.0	0.518734	[ "B", "B" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.348019281845346, "System B": 0.4881483316905861, "Tie": 0.16383238646406803 }, { "System A": 0.33825952123151065, "System B": 0.5533246139777885, "Tie": 0.10841586479070081 } ]	null
00043	This petition is by the State directed against the order dated 10.11.1998 passed by the High Court by which the charges framed against the respondent were quashed. The relevant and necessary facts to dispose of this petition are: The respondent was working as a Road Transport Inspector in the Regional Office of the Roa...	Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct	Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-l-v2.0	0.023796	[ "B", "A" ]	[ true, true ]	AILACasedocs	autotrust/JEV-27B	mteb_AILA_casedocs_4106e6bcc72e0698d714ea8b101355e3e238431a_default_test-original-n50-s0	[ { "System A": 0.008687405098957933, "System B": 0.9903488971870461, "Tie": 0.0009636977139960333 }, { "System A": 0.9535978853290552, "System B": 0.03044317541960441, "Tie": 0.015958939251340377 } ]	null

End of preview.

Part of MTEB Gym, which ranks embedding models on a corpus without relevance labels, using a judge model.


MTEB-gym	The library: how to run the gym and submit results
gym-results	The results, one record per run
mteb/gym-runs (here)	The queries, predictions, grades and verdicts behind each record
gym-paper	The paper's analyses, computed from the two above

The files behind the results in embeddings-benchmark/gym-results. Each result there is one record; its config names the files here that it was computed from, and mteb_gym.cache_files(record) lists their paths.

grades: one row per graded document, with the query and document ids, the grade from 0 to 5, the judge's probability for each grade where it gives them, and its reasoning where it writes one. Files are grades/<task>/<judge>-<key>.jsonl, where the key identifies the judge and its settings.
verdicts: one row per comparison, with the query, both models, the winner in each presentation order, the score and the judge's reasoning. Files are verdicts/<task>/<pair>-<key>.jsonl, where the key identifies the judge and its settings.
predictions (viewer tab): one row per model and query, with the task, the generator (original for the dataset's own queries), the query set, the model and its revision, the query id and text (empty for the dataset's own queries), and the model's top 100 documents with their full-precision scores, so nDCG@10 from a row equals nDCG@10 from the file. Rows are in tables/predictions/<task>.jsonl.
queries (viewer tab): one row per generated query, with the task, the generator, the query set, the query id and text, the documents it was written from, its filter score and the generator's settings. The paper's runs had the LLM filter off, so the score is empty. Rows are in tables/queries/queries.jsonl. query_set is the same in both tabs, so you can join them.

The tabs come from the files below:

predictions files: mteb's prediction file for each model, unchanged, with the top 1000 documents per query: {query id: {document id: score}}. Files are predictions/<task>/<model>@<revision>/<query set>/<task>_predictions.json.
queries files: generated query sets, each query with the documents it was written from and its filter score, and the generator's settings. Files are queries/<task>/<query set>.json; a record's config.query_set names its file. A run on a dataset's own queries has none.

from datasets import load_dataset
from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download

grades = load_dataset("mteb/gym-runs", "grades", split="data")
verdicts = load_dataset("mteb/gym-runs", "verdicts", split="data")
queries = load_dataset("mteb/gym-runs", "queries", split="data")
predictions = load_dataset("mteb/gym-runs", "predictions", split="data")
snapshot_download("mteb/gym-runs", repo_type="dataset", allow_patterns=["predictions/NFCorpus/*"])  # files

Downloads last month: 1,821