license issue
#1
by travisking - opened
hi, cool work and promising models/research. I hate to be this guy but the lfm2 models are released under a custom 'LFM Open License v1.0 ' which require derivative works to use this same license. this variant being an LFM2-350M derivative and listed as apache-2.0 is not possible/in violation (unless I am missing something).
In general: if model released with a restrictive (non apache-2.0/MIT) license, it is overwhelmingly likely that any and all derivative works must follow that license (otherwise... their custom license is pointless..)
I apologize for the mistake, and I’ll update the license to correctly reflect the LFM Open License v1.0.
Appreciate you taking the time to flag this.
Jaswanth-0821 changed discussion status to closed