new

Get trending papers in your email inbox!

Subscribe

Daily Papers

byAK and the research community

Nov 10

nnFoundation: 3D Foundation Models for Radiology

Radiological artificial intelligence has advanced rapidly, yet most systems remain narrowly task-specific, data-intensive, and fragile under domain shift. Foundation models promise more transferable and data-efficient solutions, but existing approaches are limited in scale, evaluated narrowly, and often assume that a single pretrained model can support diverse downstream tasks. Here we present nnFoundation, complementary convolutional and transformer-based 3D radiological foundation models. Developed within the Human Radiome Project (THRP), nnFoundation is trained on 2.1 million CT, MRI, and PET image volumes from 125 institutional and public datasets. We evaluate them across 108 tasks spanning segmentation, detection, classification, report generation, and image retrieval, including evaluations under domain shift, by external partners and in low-data and low-compute regimes. Across all task types, our convolution- and transformer-based nnFoundation models consistently outperform both prior 3D foundation models and training from scratch, establishing state-of-the-art performance for radiological imaging. However, performance follows a consistent task-dependent structure: the convolutional nnFoundation model dominates spatially localized tasks, whereas the transformer-based nnFoundation model excels in tasks requiring global semantic reasoning and in frozen-feature settings. Dynamically aligning the foundation model topology with the dataset characteristics post-hoc further improves transfer across heterogeneous 3D settings. These results show that transferable 3D radiological performance is governed not by a single universal model, but by the interplay of scalable pretraining, complementary architectures, and dataset-aware adaptation. We release nnFoundation models integrated into nnU-Net and nnDetection, enabling immediate application across established radiology workflows.

  • 83 authors
·
Sep 21

Transforms for LLM Quantization: The Great Inversion and Format Co-Design

Most competitive 4-bit LLM research pipelines now open the same way: apply a linear, function-preserving transform (rotation, scaling, permutation, non-orthogonal affine) so the outlier mass sits more favorably against the group scales, and only then round. Yet we are aware of no survey dedicated to this transform stage, and its literature is quietly re-deriving an older theory. We identify and formalize the principle that organizes it, the Great Inversion: allocation-flexible coding rewards energy concentration, whereas the grouped shared-scale quantization a deployed matrix instruction performs rewards within-group flattening. Classical transform coding (1963: decorrelate, allocate bits, quantize) spends different bits per coordinate at a fixed total rate; for a Gaussian source at high rate the Karhunen-Loeve transform's concentration minimizes distortion. A deployed operand tile instead carries one absolute-maximum scale per group and equal bits everywhere, with no allocation; on a uniform grid that objective rewards flattening, approached by Hadamard incoherence. We prove that opposition under within-group majorization: the prescriptions point in opposite directions, each backed by a proof against its own objective, and for a generic spectrum no optimality guarantee transfers. A second axis is the number format: the non-uniform FP4 grid makes flattening buy less, MXFP4's power-of-two block scale still rewards a rotation confined to that block, and NVFP4's mantissa-carrying scale largely removes that pull, so the target pole depends jointly on allocation regime and format. We survey 200 works to a June 2026 cutoff; classify 43 transform methods by structure, data-awareness, searched-versus-constructed, and runtime cost; record, where reported, how they compose with GPTQ rounding; distill a first-choice guide by deployment regime; and close with the open problems it exposes.

  • 1 authors
·
Aug 24

Direct Factorization of the Karhunen-Loève Transform of AR(1) Sources

The Karhunen--Loève transform (KLT) of the stationary AR(1) source is the classical optimality benchmark of transform coding. Its frequencies are roots of the transcendental equations of Ray and Driver, and the transform has therefore long been treated as an unstructured dense matrix. Rather than compute the exact KLT, the field turned to fast approximations of it, most famously the discrete cosine transform (DCT). This paper shows that the retreat was premature. The exact AR(1) KLT admits direct recursive factorizations, at every order Nge2 and every correlation coefficient ρin(0,1): at even orders, the transform reduces to a butterfly stage, two half-order copies of itself, and orthogonal corrections generated by rank-one boundary perturbations of the covariance; at odd orders, to two copies of the KLT of the one-sided prediction residual and an arrowhead stage absorbing the center sample. The residual KLT recurses through half order as well. All correction stages are Cauchy-structured, and applying them by the fast multipole method yields exact-KLT algorithms of O(Nlog N) complexity---the same order as the FFT and the fast sinusoidal transforms. The factorizations follow from the covariance matrix by the Sherman--Morrison identity and the classical secular eigenvalue updates, and degenerate, as ρto1, to the known parity splittings of the DCT-II. As secondary results, the factorization constants are shown to be algebraic functions of ρ---in radicals for all Nle8---and complete exact KLT modules for N=2,dots,8 are given.

  • 1 authors
·
Aug 5