Datasets:
Formats:
csv
Languages:
English
Size:
1K - 10K
Tags:
open-science
superconductivity
superconductor-discovery
strongly-correlated
materials-discovery
2d-materials
License:
README: SEO/AEO English dataset card (TL;DR, FAQ, Pairing Index, keywords)
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -3,17 +3,25 @@ license: apache-2.0
|
|
| 3 |
tags:
|
| 4 |
- open-science
|
| 5 |
- superconductivity
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
- strongly-correlated
|
| 7 |
- materials-discovery
|
| 8 |
- 2d-materials
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
- moire
|
| 10 |
- hubbard-model
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
- challenge
|
| 12 |
- leaderboard
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
- cpu-friendly
|
| 14 |
language:
|
| 15 |
- en
|
| 16 |
-
pretty_name: "OSC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
configs:
|
| 18 |
- config_name: candidates
|
| 19 |
data_files:
|
|
@@ -23,92 +31,160 @@ configs:
|
|
| 23 |
data_files:
|
| 24 |
- split: active
|
| 25 |
path: active_challenge.csv
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 26 |
---
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
# OSC — Open Superconductor Challenge
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-
**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-
|
| 35 |
-
**unconventional (d-wave) superconducting tendency**. We compute an effective model for each
|
| 36 |
-
material; you estimate its pairing with your own method (a laptop CPU is enough) and submit;
|
| 37 |
-
we confirm the top entries with a precise strongly-correlated reference solver.
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-
|
| 40 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
---
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-
##
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-
| File |
|
| 47 |
|---|---|
|
| 48 |
-
| `candidates.csv` | The full browsable universe
|
| 49 |
-
| `active_challenge.csv` | The **active set** (metallic / small-gap) with the provided **effective model**: `t`, `U`, `U/t`, and **`nef`** = N(E_F)
|
| 50 |
-
| `submissions.csv` | The baseline leaderboard rows
|
| 51 |
-
| `instrument/osc_instrument.py` | The participant tool — pure Python, no install. |
|
| 52 |
-
| `instrument/pair_baseline.py` | An open d-wave pair-susceptibility routine to build on. |
|
| 53 |
-
| `PROVENANCE.md` |
|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
-
## The effective model (what you
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
-
For
|
| 58 |
-
|
| 59 |
-
|
| 60 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
## How to participate (light track — any laptop, no install)
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
-
|
| 65 |
-
|
| 66 |
-
|
| 67 |
-
|
| 68 |
-
|
| 69 |
-
|
| 70 |
-
|
| 71 |
-
|
| 72 |
-
|
| 73 |
-
|
| 74 |
-
|
| 75 |
-
|
| 76 |
-
|
| 77 |
-
|
| 78 |
-
|
| 79 |
-
|
| 80 |
-
|
| 81 |
-
|
| 82 |
-
|
| 83 |
-
|
| 84 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
| Prize | Amount | Awarded to |
|
| 87 |
|---|---|---|
|
| 88 |
-
| **Grand** | 1,500
|
| 89 |
-
| **Best Method (Gold)** | 1,000
|
| 90 |
-
| **Best Discovery (Open)** | 500
|
| 91 |
|
| 92 |
-
One cash prize per person (runner-up succeeds on overlap). Ranks 2–5 and all valid entrants
|
| 93 |
-
co-authorship, hall of fame, leaderboard credit.
|
| 94 |
|
| 95 |
-
|
| 96 |
|
| 97 |
-
|
| 98 |
-
|
| 99 |
-
|
| 100 |
-
|
| 101 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 102 |
|
| 103 |
-
|
| 104 |
|
| 105 |
-
|
| 106 |
-
temperature. Candidates are computational predictions (C2DB), not experimentally confirmed.
|
| 107 |
|
| 108 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 109 |
|
| 110 |
-
|
| 111 |
-
and authenticated submission are live; the active set is being expanded. Star/watch to follow.
|
| 112 |
|
| 113 |
-
*Hosted by FINAL-Bench as an open-science initiative.
|
| 114 |
-
(GPL/MIT); materials derive from C2DB (CC-BY 4.0); the verification engine is operated by the organizers.*
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
tags:
|
| 4 |
- open-science
|
| 5 |
- superconductivity
|
| 6 |
+
- superconductor-discovery
|
| 7 |
- strongly-correlated
|
| 8 |
- materials-discovery
|
| 9 |
- 2d-materials
|
| 10 |
+
- twisted-bilayer
|
| 11 |
- moire
|
| 12 |
- hubbard-model
|
| 13 |
+
- d-wave
|
| 14 |
+
- machine-learning-for-materials
|
| 15 |
+
- computational-materials-science
|
| 16 |
- challenge
|
| 17 |
- leaderboard
|
| 18 |
+
- benchmark
|
| 19 |
- cpu-friendly
|
| 20 |
language:
|
| 21 |
- en
|
| 22 |
+
pretty_name: "OSC — Open Superconductor Challenge"
|
| 23 |
+
size_categories:
|
| 24 |
+
- 1K<n<10K
|
| 25 |
configs:
|
| 26 |
- config_name: candidates
|
| 27 |
data_files:
|
|
|
|
| 31 |
data_files:
|
| 32 |
- split: active
|
| 33 |
path: active_challenge.csv
|
| 34 |
+
- config_name: submissions
|
| 35 |
+
data_files:
|
| 36 |
+
- split: leaderboard
|
| 37 |
+
path: submissions.csv
|
| 38 |
---
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
# OSC — Open Superconductor Challenge
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
+
**Screen thousands of 2D materials for unconventional (d-wave) superconductivity — from your own laptop — and climb an open, verified leaderboard.**
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
🏆 **Leaderboard, live challenge & submission:** **https://huggingface.co/spaces/FINAL-Bench/OSC-Leaderboard**
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
---
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
## TL;DR (the short answer)
|
| 49 |
+
|
| 50 |
+
OSC is a free, open-science competition on Hugging Face to find the next candidate **twisted-2D superconductor**. We provide a computed **effective model** (`t`, `U`, `N(E_F)`) for each material; you estimate its **d-wave pairing tendency** with any method — a laptop CPU is enough — and submit a small file. Provisional scores appear instantly; the organizers' precise **strongly-correlated solver** verifies the top entries and sets the official rank. Prize pool **US $3,000 + co-authorship**. Season 1 closes **31 December 2026 (23:59 KST)**. Materials derive from **C2DB** (CC-BY 4.0). No installation and no GPU are required for the light track.
|
| 51 |
+
|
| 52 |
+
- **What you get:** an effective Hubbard model per material — hopping `t`, interaction `U`, and the density of states at the Fermi level `N(E_F)`.
|
| 53 |
+
- **What you do:** compute a d-wave (d<sub>x²−y²</sub>) pairing estimate and submit it.
|
| 54 |
+
- **What we do:** verify the top submissions with a precise many-body reference solver.
|
| 55 |
+
- **Who can join:** anyone — researchers, students, and AI coding agents.
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
---
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
## What is the Open Superconductor Challenge?
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
The **Open Superconductor Challenge (OSC)** is a crowd-sourced materials-screening benchmark for **unconventional superconductivity** in two-dimensional (2D) materials. Discovering superconductors experimentally is slow and expensive, so OSC screens candidates *computationally, before the lab*: the community estimates a superconducting-pairing signal for thousands of materials, and a precise reference solver confirms the most promising ones.
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
+
OSC targets **d-wave (d<sub>x²−y²</sub>) pairing tendency** — the pairing symmetry associated with cuprates, twisted bilayer graphene, and other strongly-correlated systems — using the doped **Hubbard model** as the effective description. It is hosted by **FINAL-Bench** as an open-science initiative and is designed to be reproducible, hard to game, and accessible without specialized hardware.
|
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
+
## Why OSC matters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
+
- **Compute arbitrage:** the crowd screens broadly on laptops; the organizers spend heavy DFT and many-body compute only on the top candidates. This finds promising materials for a fraction of the usual cost.
|
| 68 |
+
- **Open and fair:** the candidate list, protocol, and baseline tools are fully open (GPL/MIT); only the final verification engine is private, which keeps the ranking un-gameable without hiding the science.
|
| 69 |
+
- **Reproducible science:** every material carries a provenance trail to C2DB, and winning methods are shared under a contributor license.
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
---
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
+
## Dataset contents
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
+
| File | Description |
|
| 76 |
|---|---|
|
| 77 |
+
| `candidates.csv` | The full browsable universe — **4,832** dynamically-stable 2D materials (C2DB-derived) enriched with our tags: chemical family, cost class, is-metal, band gap, and a screening prior. |
|
| 78 |
+
| `active_challenge.csv` | The **active competition set** (metallic / small-gap materials) with the provided **effective model**: `t` (eV), `U` (eV), `U/t`, and **`nef`** = N(E_F) (states/eV/atom). |
|
| 79 |
+
| `submissions.csv` | The baseline leaderboard rows and verified anchor scores (the OSC Pairing Index). |
|
| 80 |
+
| `instrument/osc_instrument.py` | The participant tool — pure Python, no install, runs in seconds on any laptop. |
|
| 81 |
+
| `instrument/pair_baseline.py` | An open d-wave pair-susceptibility routine to build a competitive method on. |
|
| 82 |
+
| `PROVENANCE.md` | Data source and license details (C2DB, CC-BY 4.0). |
|
| 83 |
|
| 84 |
+
## The effective model (what you receive per material)
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
+
For every active material OSC provides a downfolded **Hubbard effective model**:
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
- **`t`** — nearest-neighbor hopping (eV), from the DFT band structure.
|
| 89 |
+
- **`U`** — on-site Coulomb interaction (eV); the challenge fixes the strongly-correlated regime at **U/t = 8** (cuprate convention).
|
| 90 |
+
- **`N(E_F)`** (`nef`) — density of states at the Fermi level (states/eV/atom), the first-order BCS indicator: higher N(E_F) → stronger pairing tendency.
|
| 91 |
+
|
| 92 |
+
Your task is to do better than the first-order screen by computing an actual, **material-specific** d-wave pairing estimate.
|
| 93 |
+
|
| 94 |
+
---
|
| 95 |
|
| 96 |
## How to participate (light track — any laptop, no install)
|
| 97 |
|
| 98 |
+
You do **not** need a GPU or any installation for the light track. An AI coding agent (Claude Code, Codex) can also do every step for you — just point it at this challenge.
|
| 99 |
+
|
| 100 |
+
**1. Sign in** with Hugging Face on the [OSC Leaderboard Space](https://huggingface.co/spaces/FINAL-Bench/OSC-Leaderboard) — this verifies your identity so entries can't be posted under someone else's handle.
|
| 101 |
+
|
| 102 |
+
**2. Get the instrument** (pure Python — Windows / Linux / macOS, nothing to install):
|
| 103 |
+
```bash
|
| 104 |
+
huggingface-cli download FINAL-Bench/OSC-Superconductor \
|
| 105 |
+
instrument/osc_instrument.py instrument/pair_baseline.py \
|
| 106 |
+
--repo-type dataset --local-dir osc
|
| 107 |
+
cd osc/instrument
|
| 108 |
+
```
|
| 109 |
+
|
| 110 |
+
**3. Pick a material and run:**
|
| 111 |
+
```bash
|
| 112 |
+
python osc_instrument.py --material_id OSC-00129 --author YOUR_NAME
|
| 113 |
+
# reads the material's (t, U, N(E_F)); prints an OSC Pairing Index on the leaderboard's scale
|
| 114 |
+
# -> writes submission.json
|
| 115 |
+
```
|
| 116 |
+
To **compete on the gold track**, edit `estimate_pairing()` with your own many-body method — exact diagonalization (ED), variational Monte Carlo (VMC), DMRG, mean-field, or machine learning — that improves on the first-order N(E_F) screen.
|
| 117 |
+
|
| 118 |
+
**4. Submit your score.** Open the material's card in the **Active Challenge** tab of the Space and submit (you must be signed in), or open a Pull Request adding your `submission.json` under `submissions/` in this dataset. Your provisional score appears on the leaderboard immediately.
|
| 119 |
+
|
| 120 |
+
---
|
| 121 |
+
|
| 122 |
+
## Scoring: the OSC Pairing Index
|
| 123 |
+
|
| 124 |
+
The leaderboard reports an **OSC Pairing Index**, a readable screening score:
|
| 125 |
+
|
| 126 |
+
```
|
| 127 |
+
Pairing Index = N(E_F) × A_ref × 10000
|
| 128 |
+
```
|
| 129 |
+
|
| 130 |
+
where **A_ref = 0.0503** is the reference d-wave pairing amplitude (the max-distance d-wave pair correlation P<sub>d</sub>) measured once by the organizers' precise 6×6 doped-Hubbard solver at U/t = 8. The ×10000 factor is a pure, monotone rescale for readability — it never changes any ranking.
|
| 131 |
+
|
| 132 |
+
- **Baseline** — first-order N(E_F) screen; the bar to beat.
|
| 133 |
+
- **Provisional** — your submitted estimate, on the same scale; appears instantly.
|
| 134 |
+
- **Verified** — the organizers' precise strongly-correlated solver confirms the top entries under fixed, logged conditions and sets the official rank. Hidden validation set, rotated to prevent overfitting.
|
| 135 |
+
|
| 136 |
+
**Honest interpretation:** a higher index means a stronger d-wave pairing *tendency* by our screen — i.e. a better candidate to investigate — **not** a guaranteed critical temperature (Tc) or a confirmed superconductor. Because A_ref is currently a fixed constant, the baseline ranking tracks N(E_F); the challenge exists precisely so that participants replace this flat amplitude with real, material-specific many-body calculations.
|
| 137 |
+
|
| 138 |
+
## Tracks & prizes (total US $3,000)
|
| 139 |
|
| 140 |
| Prize | Amount | Awarded to |
|
| 141 |
|---|---|---|
|
| 142 |
+
| **Grand** | $1,500 | highest **verified** d-wave tendency (any material) |
|
| 143 |
+
| **Best Method (Gold)** | $1,000 | top **verified** score with an open-sourced method |
|
| 144 |
+
| **Best Discovery (Open)** | $500 | best **verified** new material you propose |
|
| 145 |
|
| 146 |
+
One cash prize per person (the runner-up succeeds on overlap). Ranks 2–5 and all valid entrants receive **co-authorship, hall-of-fame listing, and leaderboard credit**.
|
|
|
|
| 147 |
|
| 148 |
+
---
|
| 149 |
|
| 150 |
+
## Frequently asked questions
|
| 151 |
+
|
| 152 |
+
### Do I need a GPU or to install anything?
|
| 153 |
+
No. The light track is a single pure-Python script that runs in seconds on any laptop CPU — Windows, Linux, or macOS. A GPU only helps if you choose the advanced full-stack track.
|
| 154 |
+
|
| 155 |
+
### What exactly am I predicting?
|
| 156 |
+
A **d-wave (d<sub>x²−y²</sub>) superconducting pairing tendency** for a given 2D material, from its effective Hubbard model. This is a screening signal, not a measured critical temperature.
|
| 157 |
+
|
| 158 |
+
### Does the #1 material mean the best superconductor?
|
| 159 |
+
It means the strongest d-wave pairing *tendency by our first-order screen* — the top candidate to investigate. It is not a confirmed superconductor or the highest Tc.
|
| 160 |
+
|
| 161 |
+
### How are winners verified?
|
| 162 |
+
The organizers run a precise strongly-correlated (NQS/GFMC-class) solver on the top submissions under fixed, logged conditions. Verified entries sit above provisional ones and define the official rank.
|
| 163 |
+
|
| 164 |
+
### Do I have to reveal my method or code?
|
| 165 |
+
No — you submit only result numbers. Only prize winners share reproducible code, under a contributor license. The verification engine runs on our servers and is never distributed, which is what keeps the ranking un-gameable.
|
| 166 |
+
|
| 167 |
+
### Where does the data come from?
|
| 168 |
+
Materials derive from the **Computational 2D Materials Database (C2DB)** under CC-BY 4.0. We add value (family tags, cost classes, effective models, screening priors) and cite the source in `PROVENANCE.md`.
|
| 169 |
+
|
| 170 |
+
### When does the challenge close?
|
| 171 |
+
**Season 1 closes 31 December 2026, 23:59 KST.** The leaderboard, instrument, and authenticated submission are live now, and the active set is being expanded.
|
| 172 |
+
|
| 173 |
+
### Can an AI agent enter for me?
|
| 174 |
+
Yes. Point an AI coding agent (Claude Code / Codex) at the challenge and it can download the instrument, compute a score, and submit on your behalf.
|
| 175 |
+
|
| 176 |
+
---
|
| 177 |
+
|
| 178 |
+
## Keywords
|
| 179 |
|
| 180 |
+
superconductor discovery · unconventional superconductivity · d-wave pairing · 2D materials · twisted bilayer · moiré materials · strongly-correlated electrons · doped Hubbard model · density of states at the Fermi level · N(E_F) · computational materials science · machine learning for materials · open-science challenge · Hugging Face leaderboard · CPU-only benchmark · crowd-sourced materials screening.
|
| 181 |
|
| 182 |
+
## Citation & license
|
|
|
|
| 183 |
|
| 184 |
+
- **Baseline tools and protocol:** open source (GPL/MIT).
|
| 185 |
+
- **Materials:** derived from C2DB under CC-BY 4.0 — see `PROVENANCE.md`.
|
| 186 |
+
- **Verification engine:** operated by the organizers (FINAL-Bench), not distributed.
|
| 187 |
|
| 188 |
+
If OSC helps your work, please link the challenge Space (https://huggingface.co/spaces/FINAL-Bench/OSC-Leaderboard) and credit **FINAL-Bench — Open Superconductor Challenge**.
|
|
|
|
| 189 |
|
| 190 |
+
*Hosted by FINAL-Bench as an open-science initiative. Season 1 is open until 31 December 2026 (23:59 KST). Star and watch to follow the leaderboard.*
|
|
|