human
Sigh.  I can feel the charity.  While I can imagine how this is going to go, based on "ragbag of deplorables" terminology, no, I do not think it is. The actual magisterium teaches that one cannot receive the Eucharist while one is not properly disposed to receive it, i.e., still in a state of mortal sin.  Some (not necessarily the theologians referred to in the article, as I do not know their positions) seem to advocate that AL stands for the proposition that if remaining in objective adultery is the 'best one can do under the circumstances', that is an acceptable understanding of how to conduct oneself.

My original to BK focuses more on the impression that the folks mentioned in the article seem to assign weight to the issues raised in the 'correction' based on who wrote it, rather than it's content.  If it was a priest saying, oh, you silly lay people do not understand theology, there would be howls on here about clericalism, but when favored theologians do it is OK
gpt
{"moderation": ["safe"]}