human
No. It is not name calling.  Name calling is things like "horsefaced, swampass smelling, pussbreath spewing troll."  The words used were descriptors with concrete meaning employed to back up the commenter's reasoning as to why he did not vote for Trump.  Also, it was cohesive...the argument was backed up by reasoning related to the argument. Perhaps the word you were looking for is valid or convincing.  I think if the commenter simply said "an orange faced buffoon? not the kind of person i want for president," then it would still be cohesive, but would it be convincing or valid?  eh, not really.
gpt
{"moderation": ["insult"]}