human
Sorry Political Junkie, but is it your *implied* argument based on these cherry picked data that climate change is a Chinese Hoax and thousands of hard working scientists are all lying to you? I mean, it SEEMS like you're implying this by comparing these storms to a 1935 storm, but you don't actually make the argument. Is that because you have no science background and only self-justifying interwebs resurch? Because you can't make the argument coherently so you "JUST" throw up a tiny tiny pinhole of data and smugly grin a if you've debunked thousands of studies over decades? 
It's pretty sad how many conservatives seem to think their untrained gut instinct or some facts some other con troll threw together on a blog are reality and thousands of scientists are a bunch of liars. 
I mean, here you are at a computer on the internet, relying MASSIVELY on science with every keystroke, but when they say something you don't like they're all liars? Fool.
gpt
{"moderation": ["toxicity", "insult"]}