human
First of all, Robert499, this case is NOT about  TWU's requirement that unmarried persons refrain from having sex.  It's about:

*  TWU rules allowed married heterosexual students to have sex together.

*  TWU rules do NOT allow same-sex married students to have sex together.

The LSUC in fact complied with its statutory mandate to consider the public interest when deciding whether to accredit a TWU law school. 

It also appears that even TWU doesn't believe that the Teachers decision applied in this case.  As the Ontario Court of Appeal wrote:

"TWU moved away from its earlier categorical position that TWU 2001 was determinative of the outcome of the appeal. ... As the Divisional Court stated, at para. 60, “[t]he issue raised before the Supreme Court of Canada in [TWU 2001] involved different facts, a different statutory regime, and a fundamentally different question.”
gpt
{"moderation": ["safe"]}