human
Randy brings up tweets about Leslie Jones and how people "tweet negatively" as if they are panning the movie, and expresses bewilderment why people would be labeled racist. But why be vague? Let everyone decide? How about:
"Your Ghostbusters isn't the first to have an ape in it"
"Big lipped c--n, big lipped c--n, big lipped c--n"
"This Leslie (Kong) has a funny face"
and many more tweets of apes. 

So, yes, people are racist and it shouldn't be hard to say that and not just refer to to as "negative". 

When people tweet and it ends their career, the people doing the firing are corporations, not usually portrayed as the most liberal. Isn't this a perfectly fine outcome of free speech? Someone says something stupid, many people say, "I'm offended" (as is their right), and corporations cover their rear end. That person can still tweet dumb things, but just not while costing a company sales.
gpt
{"moderation": ["toxicity", "insult"]}