Instruct: Given a premise, retrieve hypotheses that are entailed by the premise.
Query: That's right. That's the important hurdle, and we'd like to jump that first, but the other ones, Justice, you're right, in 1831 and in 1909 Congress extended terms in a way that is inconsistent with the strongest form of the test that we have advanced. Those extensions, however, were never challenged in any court and certainly not considered by this Court.
in 2 separate years terms were extended unevenly
The extensions were challenged in court
The terms of Federal copyright  were not extended in 1830
Justice was an act that extended terms
In 1909 Congress made  a bad decision to extend terms.
Congress had trouble finding balance in the case
The court has no issues
The courts were not concrete
Euclid v. Amble was heard in the judicial branch of government
the courts were not outside
the judgment of Congress doesn't matter
Supreme courts are temporary
federal court never had a ruling
Court jurisdiction by default has happened more than once.
the 1790 statute the Congress specifically was aware, but they didn't care
the Congress won't make judgments
The court has over 2 decades of experience
There were not any further objections to the record
Congress has never again extended terms.
The court in question was concerned with deciding if the Third Amendment applied to the CTEA.
Euclid v. Ambler was decided this century
The case brought in the 200's apply to the previous cases
Congress has somebody in it named diana
Congress has somebody in it named bruce
Congress has somebody in it named bill