Instruct: Given a premise, retrieve a hypothesis that is entailed by the premise.
Query: The rest of it I don't have any problem because I think it does not do violence to my opinions. And this gets into a semantical exercise to some degree but one that is important, I understand, to the reporters. We have got to cut the Gordian knot here. Either --
My opinions have not been violated.
the journalist will not have to defend their reporting
the reporters testimony is not necessary  
Journalists don't need answers
reporter's privilege is important to him.
Reporters focus on semantics.
The issue being discussed caused the narrator to be unsure of the point of the statement 
I like to see people disagree.  
The judged ruled that reporters can not be used
The person who did the reporting for this story was different from the person who did the writing.
The statement in the article was heard by the reporters.
Journalists try to be skeptical
Reporters will be questioned about whether the content of their articles is true
If the reporters do something that is unspoken i this text, that means they are speaking about the contents of the affidavit.
The reporters were later forced to answer questions.
Reporters note was being reviewed.
Journalistic integrity is problematic
Producing an accurate newspaper of the events is going to be be difficult. 
Though I agree with that, I may or may not disagree with other things.
There were several different unique viewpoints in this situation.
Other people thought the speaker made his views clear
It was a necessary exercise that meant a lot to the jurors.
The speaker is referring to a book
Gordian knots can not be easily solved.

The speaker is referring to blog post