Instruct: Given a premise, retrieve a hypothesis that is entailed by the premise.
Query: But I thought you were saying that if you accept the Copyright Clause argument, then you have a way, in effect, of devaluing the Government's claim of its important interest and important objective when you get to the First Amendment intermediate scrutiny analysis.
The narrator has misunderstood the statement
Petitioners submit such a blanket extension of existing terms exceeds Congress's power under the Copyright Clause and it get along with  the First Amendment
The Copyright Clause is not being upheld
We want the right to copy verbatim works that should be in the public domain and would be in the public domain but for a statute that cannot be justified under ordinary First Amendment analysis or under a proper reading of the limits built into the Copyright 13 Clause
We want the right to copy verbatim works that should be in the public domain and would be in the public domain but for a statute that cannot be justified under ordinary First Amendment analysis or under a proper reading of the limits built into the Copyright 15 Clause
We want the right to copy verbatim works that should be in the public domain and would be in the public domain but for a statute that cannot be justified under ordinary First Amendment analysis or under a proper reading of the limits built into the Copyright 19 Clause
First Amendment values, vital speech interest at stake of this case which is most important
We want the right to copy verbatim works that should be in the public domain and would be in the public domain but for a statute that cannot be justified under ordinary First Amendment analysis or under a proper reading of the limits built into the Copyright 17 Clause
We want the right to copy verbatim works that should be in the public domain and would be in the public domain but for a statute that cannot be justified under ordinary First Amendment analysis or under a proper reading of the limits built into the Copyright 12 Clause
We want the right to copy verbatim works that should be in the public domain and would be in the public domain but for a statute that cannot be justified under ordinary First Amendment analysis or under a proper reading of the limits built into the Copyright 18 Clause
The Copyright Clause has limits in originality that the court has determined have meaning.
We want the right to copy verbatim works that should be in the public domain and would be in the public domain but for a statute that cannot be justified under ordinary First Amendment analysis or under a proper reading of the limits built into the Copyright 14 Clause
First Amendment interest raises after 15 years.
We want the right to copy verbatim works that should be in the public domain and would be in the public domain but for a statute that cannot be justified under ordinary First Amendment analysis or under a proper reading of the limits built into the Copyright 6 Clause
The copyright Clause's overall purpose creates confusion.
We want the right to copy verbatim works that should be in the public domain and would be in the public domain but for a statute that cannot be justified under ordinary First Amendment analysis or under a proper reading of the limits built into the Copyright 9 Clause
First Amendment values, vital speech interest at stake of this case we must agree
The Feist opinions implies limits to the Copyright Clause.
We want the right to copy verbatim works that should be in the public domain and would be in the public domain but for a statute that cannot be justified under ordinary First Amendment analysis or under a proper reading of the limits built into the Copyright 8 Clause
an unlimited time would violate the Copyright Clause, leading to anger
The equity argument is under the Necessary and Improper Clause.
The Copyright Clause is very easy to violate.
Copyright Clause has been claimed by stan
the clause has been rewritten several times
Copyright Clause has a q