Instruct: Given a premise, retrieve hypotheses that are entailed by the premise.
Query: Whenever we are engaged in a conflict, or whenever we are contemplating a conflict which has the potential that this conflict has, we need to realize that it may well be a situation, no matter what the outcome, in which there are no winners and losers but rather a situation in which everybody loses when we choose war as an alternative to diplomacy.
War can be a zero sum game 
There are slim hopes that diplomacy is the complete solution to an ongoing violent situation.
The ceasefire was sparked by a cry of desperation  from the winning side in the conflict.
Going into a fight where you can't see will never end well
People don't care about war or peace
war is the most logical answer
The war caused much destruction.
Diplomacy always curtails violent situations.
Silence is not the way to go with your enemies.  
There is never a need for diplomacy.
Diplomacy is having a positive effect on a violent situation.
In the end there could only be one victor.
world affairs always involves us
It can take a while to make an agreement after you have fought a war.
this would start a war.
The war caused significant damage.
We should keep the peace.
There was no winner in this argument
The narrator thinks there should be war in the Middle East
There were no casualties in the war.
Neither party is willing to compromise on issues.
The losing party can't be forced to pay
Diplomacy is not an alternative to war.
There is never a need for diplomacy.
sometimes war is the most logical anserr