Instruct: Given a premise, retrieve a hypothesis that is entailed by the premise.
Query: I understand that that's not what the defendants want in this case, but I don't think it's called for. And, as a matter of fact, I think if I did that and I ordered that and if -- I assume that the reporters would not testify and I would predict, if it went to the Third Circuit on that basis, I would be reversed. I don't think that that's a fair area of inquiry to get into.
There is no justice in going into that area of inquiry 
The reporters won't be called to testify.
The reporters arent going to testify
It is unnecessary for defendants to have the opportunity to examine the reporters as fact witnesses.
the reporters would think about testifying 
The courts might hear matters that don't fall into these categories.
I am acutely cognizant of the fact that this trial has negative media coverage, and it is surely not my intent to force a constitutional confrontation with two reporters and to create a side show that we don't need to.
The defendant in the case was not protected by the courts, as originally agreed upon.
The least important question then is, with respect to the reporters' appearance today, is it your understanding that the reporters will invoke different privileges cited by them yesterday, if called, when called, to testify by the plaintiffs?
the journalist will not be compelled to speak in court
The reconsideration, in some way, caused the reporters to have to testify at certain depositions.
The Court will ask the reporters to testify.
The reporters have not testified in court.
In some circumstances the courts might hear matters that don't fall into these categories
This statement was made by a lawyer to the judge and he was giving his opinion about the court having some discretion about the questioning.
The judged ruled that reporters can not be used
The court's can sometimes take on other matters that don't apply to this.
the court can change the judgment
The most important question then is, with respect to the reporters' appearance today, is it your understanding that the reporters will invoke different privileges cited by them yesterday, if called, when called, to testify by the plaintiffs?
The decision of this court in the Wheaton does not know about this.
The statement was not given by a judge. 
The thing filed by reporters caused them to have to testify
the defendants want justice in this case
the reporters would think about testifying 
the third circuit would think hard about the case before reversing