Instruct: Retrieve semantically similar text.
Query: We have a copyright term that's consistent with the concept of the creator plus the creator's first generation heirs. We have a copyright term, remember, which supersedes the earlier copyright provisions that were added to the period between creation and publication, so that the limited number of years in the first, the 1790 and the 1831 statute were the number of years plus the relatively unlimited period of time between creation and publication, so we don't have anything remotely like that in this situation.
Our vision is in line with the creator's vision.
70 years is too long for a copyright to last.
an unlimited time would violate the Copyright Clause, which is bad
Someone has a clear idea of what the time is for violating the copyright clause.
Copyright Clause is a legal term
Copyrights aren't for forever.
setting a term existed before 1800
The copyright year is prior to 2018.
after 2 years, copyrights lose their value
copyrights lose value when holder turns 70
a decision has been made on the subject
The copyright clause has a range of applications 
The copyright year the is year after 2016.
Something short of perpetual is still limited. 
They agree with something
Copyrights only last for a limited time.
The clause is said to contain limitations
I think there are many precedents to this situation
There also exists something called the "grandfather hypothesis".
there is a ninteen day grace period before entering public domain
The copyright clause is a secret
the term has been used for more than a decade
Copyright terms are considered null and void if it is found that the creator never filed to include their heirs.
The creator's heirs have no say over copyright.
1790 was less than 20 years ago.