Instruct: Given a premise, retrieve hypotheses that are entailed by the premise.
Query: That's right. All that I'm suggesting is, here is a plain meaning of the term that gives effect to the constitutional limit in a way that assures that, in fact, the limit is respected, contrary to the Government's argument, which, in effect, permits Congress the power perpetually to extend terms. If I may reserve the remainder of my time.
The author is talking about how the constitution has a clause that gives the government the power to extend terms. 
I agree that the proposed budge will allow ourselves to get overextended.
Justice was an act that extended terms
The 1976 extension could be unconstitutional and off putting.
Choice is guaranteed by the constitution. 
limitation in the clause is known by bill
The terms of Federal copyright  have been extended more than 3 times
Something short of perpetual is still limited. 
Congress was never given any power
Reduction of the size of government should be executed over several years
Congress extended the term in 1977.
The speaker knows the constitution better than others
Most people believe that the retrospective extension is the strongest First Amendment argument
We should use some imagination to be sure to continue to come to a touchstone and not to challenge the Chair by forcing the Russian Chair to make a ruling.
Territorial governments like to operate by adapting or ensuring the flexible application of legislation, this process has been occurring since Obama was president. 
Congress is not a reasonable form of government
congress met at least 104 times
The proposed budget allows ourselves to get overextended.
The prerogatives of the assembly are being contraidicted
The equifax argument is under the Necessary and Proper Clause.
There must be a limit.
The Feist opinions implies limits to the Copyright Clause.
The author is explaining how the Government has a constitutional right to extend terms.
The constitutional limit on terms is 2 years
Most governments are ran by monkeys