Instruct: Given a premise, retrieve hypotheses that are entailed by the premise.
Query: So based upon the response that you gave to your attorney, is it a fair statement that you began as a plaintiff in this case in December, 2004, without ever having personally witnessed the actions of the Dover School Board as they debated and enacted the policy on which this lawsuit is based? MR. HARVEY: Objection. It's compound.
he has spoken to his attorney
Decisions were made by the court.
There are some decisions that have been made, and the court has made some of them.
The Dover police  were all talking to the captain . Do you think he used her house phone
The speaker was uninformed as to the content of the motion.
The speaker has had a ongoing complaint for many months concerning the curriculum change.
The other side objected on hearsay. 
The speaker had misunderstood the governor's previous position.
The school board denied the request for the tapes from the meeting
A member of the school board got in trouble for fraud
Your Honor was spoken by dean
The elaborate scheme had not yet been proven when the attorney general made this claim.
Dover parents benefited from that member's actions
The petitioners are being asked to make a judgment.
The judge speaking was a private lawyer for 20 years
The prerogatives of the assembly are being contraidicted
Board members have received questions about the curriculum change.
Someone from Dover schools has heard of Christianity.
The speaker is referring to some type of legal proceeding. 
The letter to the editor by the school board member reveals important secrets.
Allie considered filing a lawsuit against the fair. 
The Dorean Group's claim was proven factual.
He began as a plaintiff in this case in November, 2004.
There is no attorney.
He began as a plaintiff in this case in 2003.