Instruct: Given a premise, retrieve hypotheses that are entailed by the premise.
Query: I thought my opinion was clear in that regard, and as you appropriately characterize, no questions as to bias or motivation or reasons to misrepresent quotes would be allowed in. There I believe we would decidedly fly in the face of established case law.
No one actually has a fly in their face, the speaker just means that their is a potential for something to be contrary to legal precedent.
The reporter's privilege was upheld by the judge because of the fact witnesses.
The reporters were truthful in their interpretation of the First Amendment.
Refusal to answer questions is grounds for suspicion
The judge meant to imply fact witnesses.
With respect to reporter testimony to get a hearsay exception, defendants are allowed to ask the same types of questions as plaintiffs. 
The plaintiff objects to the judge's comments being on record.  
These three guys could refuse to answer any questions, by invoking the 9th Amendment.
A bias argument will not be side-doored by us.
Journalists should be allowed to exclude quotes from articles.
We were biased in our reporting.
You wonder if there may not be a chance to accept the (statement sworn in court to be true) instead of the statements (in court).

Testimonies shall relate to a reporters' bias.
We refuse to side door an argument that's biased.
the judge thought the question was too personal
Witnesses should never answer when the Court should rule on it.
The reporter revealed that he thought the information was biased.
Many historians, including Erskine May, think that the practice of forbidding the use of direct citations from debates in the House of Commons related to preventing fruitless arguments.
Many historians, including Erskine May, say that the practice of forbidding the use of direct citations from debates in the House of Commons related to preventing fruitless arguments.
Could we then go back to the rude Justice O'Connor's question?
The speaker shows concern about the influence of reporters on the trial. 
The judged ruled that reporters can not be used
the speaker values respect for case law above all else 
The speaker has a high regard for case law
The speaker was intentionally vague in the comments they are referencing