Instruct: Given a premise, retrieve a hypothesis that is entailed by the premise.
Query: That, I take it, is a harm. Their works have already been created. Harm number 2. The fact that people, for the 99 percent of the copyrights that have no commercial value after 70 years, have to find the copyright holder to put them in databases. The cost of that, on my numbers in here, made up, at least a billion dollars, or they can't find the people at all and get permission, an innumerable cost, un -- valuable cost to people who want to use it.
copyrights is a harmful issue
Owners of verbatim works would lose money if their work was placed in the public domain
copyrights never lose their monetary value
copyrights have value infinitely.
This information can be very expensive to extract.
There are copyrights.
The second game cost more to make than the first game.
The idea cost thousands of dollars to make.
copyrights have their value for life.
perpetual copyright has value
It's impossible to put unpublished writing online by paying someone, but it would be a good use of your time if you could. 
copyrights never lose their value
the difference between a copyright that lasts 100 years or last 1000 years is probably about 10000 dollars
the difference between a copyright that lasts 100 years or last 1000 years is probably about $2000 on a penny
If Copyright 16 Clause was properly read, then people could make money by copying verbatim works
copyrights have commercial value after 10 years
the difference between a copyright that lasts 100 years or last 1000 years is probably about $5000 on a penny
70 years is too long for a copyright to last.
In some cases, the person who created the work does not own the copyright in that work.
Small businesses get a higher cost.
an unlimited time would violate the Copyright Clause, and that's going to be harmful
copyrights lose value when holder turns 70
copyrights have their value for life.
copyrights never lose their value
copyrights never lose their monetary value