Instruct: Given a premise, retrieve hypotheses that are entailed by the premise.
Query: Bill C-3 provides a dangerous and unnecessary exemption authorizing judges not to issue warrants for the taking of a sample if they believe that in doing so the impact on the individual's privacy and security would be grossly disproportionate to the public interest in the protection of society.
The bill issued immediately before C-4 authorizes judges to not issue warrants and is dangerous
Bill C-32 will not help information gathering. 
Canadians would have a right to privacy of public information under the principles of Bill C-54.
there is no Bill c-32
the third circuit would think hard about the case before reversing
Bill C-54 has already been passed in Canada to protect the right of Canadians to privacy of personal information that is collected, used or disclosed in an increasingly information based economy and world.
Bill C-32 has no changes made
Bill C-18 will provide customs officers with too much jurisdictional powers 
Bill C-43 was very controversial.
They really didn't like the bill under Bill C-43
Bill C-54 well ensure greater Privacy when dealing with financial and other institutions
Bill C-40 makes their extradition process less accessible
American trade secretaries protest Bill C-103.
Bill C-32 is not considered.
Bill C-54 is related to the issue of privacy codes
Bill C-32 is opposed by conservatives.
the judge thought the question was too personal
The court in question was concerned with deciding if the Third Amendment applied to the CTEA.
Bill C-32 will damage the oceans.
Bill C-54 addresses changes to various privacy codes
federally regulated financial institutions, credit bureaus and federal corporations wrote Bill C-393
The new powers given to customs officers through Bill C-18 will be abused
Bill C-3 authorizes judges to issue warrants for the taking of a sample.
Judges authorized bill C-3.
Bill C-3 provides an exemption that authorizes judges to take samples.