Instruct: Given a premise, retrieve hypotheses that are entailed by the premise.
Query: And at the time when you wrote the original order and you used the words "perceived, saw, and heard," we were concerned, as you well know, with the word "perceived" in terms as to what's the thought process. And there was dialogue on the phone amongst all of us, and you made it very clear that you did not want any testimony that would otherwise relate to biases and prejudices. And, in fact, when you reviewed the notes of the reporters, you had also indicated that your review of Heidi Bubb's notes and the e-mails clearly evidence that there was no bias in the writings, those writings.
There was no bias in the writing.
The reporters have been trained to give a fair testimony
We were biased in our reporting by misquoting someone.
The agent did not make any assumptions in this text.
We were biased in our reporting.
The Agent's opinion was meant to allow the testimony of the reporters to go in a particular way.
No one was prejudges.
we are sure that the statement was not volunteered
Bush had received no questions prior to this one.
The secret recordings did not contain incriminating evidence.
The reporter's privilege was upheld by the judge because of the fact witnesses.
A bias argument will not be side-doored by us.
There were no other accusations.
The goal was to be factual in this circumstance. 
The reporters refused to answer under oath.
The reporters will give a fair testimony
It was not the motion, but the order that came from it that directly caused the reporters having to testify.
The judge meant to imply fact witnesses.
The statement was perfect, and had no need of any different drafts.
The boys didn't mean to tamper with evidence.
The judged ruled that reporters can not be used
Reporters note was being reviewed.
No one was prejudges.
You find "perceived, saw, and heard" to mean physical observation.
The article thinks that perceived is strong evidence