Instruct: Given a premise, retrieve a hypothesis that is entailed by the premise.
Query: Instead of talking about replacement workers, maybe we should be talking about replacing the dispute settlement mechanism in the labour code so that we actually have something that means Canadians will be able to keep their jobs and there will be a reasonable, viable alternative to going out on strike.
we need something in labour code that means Canadians will be able to keep their jobs
Some Canadians are unemployed.
Canadians will not have jobs
we want to replace workers
Canadians can count on their unemployment service to provide for them.
All employers in Canada have good labour relations
There are laws that govern aspects of a strike.
The agreement concerns making sure certain employees are laid off
The Minister of Labour can be sued.
There are unemployed individuals in Canada.
The author wants to make sure employers can break the law.
All employers in Canada value good labour relations
Candian jobs were affected by this.
They want to agree on fair wages.
Canadian steel producers want to get protection through an act.
The Speaker omitted the employees not mentioned in the Canada Labour Code. 
Canadians are being asked to understand the frustration of workers in the country.
Denying employers from using scabs is what allows the union to be more level and more negotiable
Canadian steel producing organizations want reassurance by an act.
Canadians will vote for a new wage
Denying employers from using scabs is what allows the union to be more stable
Denying employers from using scabs is what allows the union to be more stable/balanced
we want to replace canadians
we want to replace workers
Citizens of the country which capital is Ottawa should be able to keep their jobs