Instruct: Given a premise, retrieve hypotheses that are entailed by the premise.
Query: In this case when you murder somebody it's hate, Jim. The crime is hate. And they got the ultimate punishment. I'm not exactly sure how you enhance the penalty any more than the death penalty. We happen to have a statute on the books that's a hate crimes statute in Texas.
the death penalty is the ultimate penalty
The speaker would pass a hate crimes law.
The killing was justified.
The majority of Texas government don't believe that crimes against minorities are done in hate but believe them to be coincidental. 
Canadian citizens are not eligible for the death penalty under Texas law. 
The only motivation for murder is hate
Laws made against hate crimes were purposely pushed aside and not given much support because of the Republican majority in the state.
there are higher punishment than the death penalty
there is no greater penalty than the death penalty
Texas doesn't recognize hate crimes.
James Byrd is named in the hate crimes law.
The death could be motivated by murder.
The failed execution of hate crimes laws went unacknowledged as people easily accepted the decision.
The writer believes that it will be hard to punish them worse after they are put to death.
the death could be murder motivated.
Texas is putting them to their deaths
They tried to pass a hate crime law.
Racial profiling is abundant in Texas.
The writer believes Its hard to punish someone after being put to death. 
A hate crimes law did not succeed.
According to Hater, people in Texas don't like a thoroughly cooked steak.
Since the fear of crime is virtually a universal phenomenon, the death penalty is an effective deterrent.
Texas doesn't recognize hate crimes.
The only motivation for murder is hate
Murder is not a hate crime, according to the speaker.