Instruct: Given a premise, retrieve hypotheses that are entailed by the premise.
Query: That, in the opinion of this House, the government should implement a ``Regulatory Budget'', parallel to the traditional spending budget, which would detail estimates of the total cost of each individual regulation including the government enforcement costs as well as the cost of compliance to individual citizens and businesses; and include a risk/benefit analysis of each regulation, to enable cost/benefit analysis of regulation by parliamentarians.
The spending budget is considered to be traditional.
The government should refrain from implementing a Regulatory Budget.
The house is against a regulatory budget.
 The government should not implement a Regulatory Budget.
The government should forget to implement a Regulatory Budget.
The government never should implement a Regulatory Budget.
Legalization could save taxpayers money.
The government shall not implement a Regulatory Budget.
The government should never implement a Regulatory Budget.
detailed estimates for all spending should be mandatory 
The government should have a budget no matter what the house thinks
A consensus will be reached about the costs of the referendum. 
Budget should be considered. 
Legalization could save money.
There are multiple budgetary measures.
I think limited government is more expensive
The plan is focused on a budget.
The government shall never implement a Regulatory Budget.
The budget plan that's being put out will bring government spending down.
There is more than one budgetary measure.
The government won't implement a Regulatory Budget.
There are fiscal benchmarks in place.
The government shall never implement a Regulatory Budget.
Enabling a Cost/benefit analysis is not something the House wants.
detailed estimates for all spending should be mandatory 