Instruct: Given a premise, retrieve hypotheses that are entailed by the premise.
Query: This Court's interpretation of "limited times" could, of course, eviscerate that term of any meaning, but under the principle of enumeration as this Court has articulated it, this Court should interpret that clause in a way that gives its terms effect in a simple way.
The way the court interpreted "limited times" makes it meaningless.
Justice, the confusing theory, which would advance the aim of limiting times in a way that is enforceable, is only applicable in the case that we brought before you here to the '98 act,
Justice, the special theory, which would advance the aim of limiting times in a way that is enforceable, is only applicable in the case that we brought before you here to the '98 act,
The Copyright Clause has limits in originality that the court has determined have meaning.
Justice, the theory, which would advance the aim of limiting times in a way that is enforceable, is only applicable in the case that we brought before you here to the long drawn out '98 act,
The Feist opinion outlines limits that are implied and the court has a history of making sure the limits are meaningful.
Limited Time would violate the the Copyright Clause for sure.
Justice, the boring theory, which would advance the aim of limiting times in a way that is enforceable, is only applicable in the case that we brought before you here to the '98 act,
Justice, the weird theory, which would advance the aim of limiting times in a way that is enforceable, is only applicable in the case that we brought before you here to the '98 act,
The court's interpretation can lead to ambiguity for certain terms.
Justice, the theory, which would advance the aim of limiting times in a way that is brutally enforceable, is only applicable in the case that we brought before you here to the '98 act,
limitation in the clause is known by amy
Copyrights must be for a limited time period.
The clause is said to contain limitations
Justice, the stupid theory, which would advance the aim of limiting times in a way that is enforceable, is only applicable in the case that we brought before you here to the '98 act,
Justice, the theory, which would greatly advance the aim of limiting times in a way that is enforceable, is only applicable in the case that we brought before you here to the '98 act,
The clause definitely contains limitations
The court acknowledged limit was 80 years. 
Unlimited time could or could not violate the Copyright Clause.
The clause is said to definitely contain limitations
We have 125 years of history of this Court making sure that all the limits, both express and implied
an unlimited time would violate the Copyright Clause, adding to the confusion
limited times is not up for interpretation 
the States' s interpretation of "limited times" could eviscerate that term of any meaning.
this Court should interpret that clause in a way that gives its terms effect in a difficult way.