Instruct: Given a premise, retrieve hypotheses that are entailed by the premise.
Query: General Olson, you say that the functional equivalent of an unlimited time would be a violation, but that's precisely the argument that's being made by petitioners here, that a limited time which is extendable is the functionable, functional equivalent of an unlimited time, a limited time that 10 years from now can be extended, and then extended again, and extended again. Why -- their argument is precisely that, a limited time doesn't mean anything unless it means, once you have established the limit for works that have been created under that limit, that's the end.
The unlimited time can be extended after ten years.
Copyright can only be extended for seven reasons.
The retrospective extension argument is an acceptable argument. 
An inventor got a ten year provision. 
In 125 years of history, this Court has upheld the Feist opinion that implies limits for originality.
Justice Ginsburg is arguing for limited times. 
The holder of an existing right may benefit the public by continuing to have that right for an additional period of time.
Repayment periods are something that it is possible to extend.
Copyrights aren't for forever.
The author is explaining how the Government has a constitutional right to extend terms.
Government can only refuse things once.
The Copyright Clause justifies the extension.
in 125 years of history, this Court has upheld the Feist opinion that determines limits for originality.
the difference between a copyright that lasts 100 years or last 1000 years is probably about two glasses of wine
You can not extend the copyright on something the day before it is set to expire.
Limited Time would violate the the Copyright Clause for sure.
copyrights have their value for life.
The objection was argued for hours.
perpetual copyright has value
For 125 years, this Court has taken into account what Justice Breyer was leading up to in regard to a limit for originality.
Petitioners didn't send  such a blanket extension of existing terms.
copyrights have value infinitely.
The petitioners are a group of mostly women that have estabilshed the limit works
Olson is very involved in this scientific experiment.
General Olson is a member of the United States Army.