Instruct: Given a premise, retrieve hypotheses that are entailed by the premise.
Query: All right. Now, previously, on September 12th, the Court entered an order which went to the motion for reconsideration. That related specifically to -- filed by the reporters. That went specifically to our August 2nd order which, in effect, said that the reporters would have to testify at certain depositions.
The reconsideration, in some way, caused the reporters to have to testify at certain depositions.
The debate is resuming.
The reporters refused to answer under oath.
they tried the method again later
The statement was changed at least twice
The Feeney judgement was stayed by the court.
there were more than 2 reporters.
the reporters testimony is important
The court never gave orders.
The plaintiff gave a response.
We're supposing that the reporter was given the statement after the reporter asked a question.
The reporters were subpoenaed to testify less than 24 hours ago, according to this person's memory.
The statement was changed after it was approved
The reporters do not want to go to court.
The case was followed closely by the media.
Their testimony was significant to the judge.
the reporters would think about testifying 
Arguments are being made at the supreme court
The statute was renewed
 ET said it was disappointed by the court order and that it planned to appeal the verdict
Residual hearsay exception under Rule 807 is not always invoked for reporters testimony but can always be for any other fact witness.
Arguments are being made in the supreme court
The court did not previously enter an order on the twelfth day of September. 
The person filed for the motion
September 12th is an important day for the reporters