Instruct: Retrieve semantically similar text.
Query: That's right, I'm sorry, Justice. What I'm saying is not that it's the retrospectivity that makes the First Amendment argument troubling -- I mean, that drives our First Amendment argument. All I'm saying is, we have addressed the retrospective portion of CTEA, and so I'm saying in the retrospective portion of CTEA you would apply ordinary, intermediate First Amendment review, and you would ask --
First Amendment is a legal concept
there have been restrictions. 
the justice thought it was a good argument
It might sometimes remain unclear.
This text regards a retrospectivity case.
It was not a mistake. 
It might sometimes be unclear.
The court has indicated something in its decisions.
There is some action goings on.
Sometimes it might remain unclear.
The speaker is against what happened.
The speaker regrets it
I may also agree with other things.
There are two motions mentioned in the context.
The question was based on the precedents 
There was an issue being investigated
The situation is fluid
there was a response.
the speaker regrets that it interfered with the point that was trying to be made.
We do talk now.
concerns can be valid
The amendment passed. 
We haven't addressed the retrospective portion of CTEA
retrospective portion of CTEA you would apply differently
First Amendment has a f