Instruct: Given a premise, retrieve a hypothesis that is entailed by the premise.
Query: And at the time when you wrote the original order and you used the words "perceived, saw, and heard," we were concerned, as you well know, with the word "perceived" in terms as to what's the thought process. And there was dialogue on the phone amongst all of us, and you made it very clear that you did not want any testimony that would otherwise relate to biases and prejudices. And, in fact, when you reviewed the notes of the reporters, you had also indicated that your review of Heidi Bubb's notes and the e-mails clearly evidence that there was no bias in the writings, those writings.
Reporters note was being reviewed.
The reporters were truthful in their interpretation of the First Amendment.
We were biased in our reporting by misquoting someone.
The reporters have been trained to give a fair testimony
The Agent's opinion was meant to allow the testimony of the reporters to go in a particular way.
We were biased in our reporting.
This study was impartial and fair.
Bush had received no questions prior to this one.
No one was prejudges.
we are sure that the statement was not volunteered
The reporters reported truthfully.
The secret recordings did not contain incriminating evidence.
The agent did not make any assumptions in this text.
There were no other accusations.
The reporter's privilege was upheld by the judge because of the fact witnesses.
A bias argument will not be side-doored by us.
It is unnecessary for defendants to have the opportunity to examine the reporters as fact witnesses.
The reporters refused to answer under oath.
The judge meant to imply fact witnesses.
The goal was to be factual in this circumstance. 
the reporters testimony is not necessary  
The reporters did not have to testify at certain depositions.
The article thinks that perceived is strong evidence
No one was prejudges.
You find "perceived, saw, and heard" to mean physical observation.