Instruct: Given a premise, retrieve a hypothesis that is entailed by the premise.
Query: I -- no, Justice Ginsburg, we would not, and the reason is again related to the method we have adopted to interpret "limited times." We have not said that "promote the progress of science" is a general and independent constraint on the Copyright Clause authority. We've said it must be looked to to interpret the scope of "limited times," and unless retrospective extensions are forbidden, it will eviscerate the meaning of "limited times." That does not occur in the context of the scope of exclusive right, nor in the context of the power to secure. If that's --
This is a lawsuit
The Copyright Clause has limits in originality that the court has determined have meaning.
Everything has to be interpreted through the scope of limited times or it won't occur in the context of limited times. 
The copyright clause encourages progress in science and arts 
The Feist opinions implies limits to the Copyright Clause.
Copyrights must be for a limited time period.
Limited Time would violate the the Copyright Clause for sure.
an unlimited time would violate the Copyright Clause, people are mad
For 125 years, this Court has taken into account what Justice Breyer was leading up to in regard to a limit for originality.
The Necessary and Proper Clause applies particularly to expired copyrights.
The Copyright Clause has limitations 
Perpetual copyright is only permitted under certain circumstances. 
The copyright clause has limits 
Copyrights aren't intended to be ceaseless.
there is a limit on congress's power when it comes to the copyright clause
Mr Lessig argument on retroactivity -prospectivity, stuff should not be got sooner as the period is not long
In 125 years of history, this Court has upheld the Feist opinion that implies limits for originality.
The copyright clause is top secret in Science
The argument may imply that the act has impeded progress in some areas. 
the existing terms won't set the limits Congress's power under the Copyright Clause and it violates the First Amendment.
The Copyright Clause is not being upheld
that extension does not extend to all subsisting copyrights. 
The person is legislator
ginsburg is a federal judge
This is a hearing