Instruct: Given a premise, retrieve a hypothesis that is entailed by the premise.
Query: Now, we offer a simple way to make this clear, express limit make sense, and that is precisely the understanding we suggest that existed in 1790. The only precedents that existed in 1790 were precedents of setting a term, and then when parliament was asked in 1735, '37, and '39 to extend it, they rejected it, and as amicus historians said, they rejected it because, as a pamphleteer described it, that would be effectively a perpetual term.
parliament rejected it 3 times
the framers decided 14 years was a constitutional limitation.
setting a term existed before 1800
parliament rejected it multiple times
It wasn't very difficult for the Framers to eschew deciding 14 years was a constitutional limitation.
Congress extended the term in the year nineteen hundred seventy one.
This Court's interpretation of "limited times" could eviscerate that term of no meaning.
The constitutional limit on terms is 2 years
Petitioners didn't send  such a blanket extension of existing terms.
Congress extended terms in 2009 in an inconsistent way
Something short of perpetual is still limited. 
parliament rejected more than twice
The court acknowledged limit was 80 years. 
The author feels that the term assures that a limit is respected.
the States' s interpretation of "limited times" could eviscerate that term of any meaning.
The petitioners are asking for a lengthy constitutional limitation.
These three guys could refuse to answer any questions, by invoking the 11th Amendment.
Congress extended the term less than 15 years ago.
The way the court interpreted "limited times" makes it without clear meaning.
he words of section 93 are rooted in Treaties written in the 19th century.
The author is explaining how the Government has a constitutional right to extend terms.
Congress can only decide to make changes three times with their treaty partners before it becomes permanent.
they want to complicate things. 
they wanted to make things confusing. 
They are talking about the 20th century. 