Instruct: Given a premise, retrieve hypotheses that are entailed by the premise.
Query: Well, the line comes from deciding what the First Amendment interest is, and if this Court heed the First Amendment interest off of this difference between selecting who gets the benefit of 20 years of extension and just simply legislating in a general way prospectively, then this Court could hold, with respect to the prospective, that it's not even necessary to raise the intermediate scrutiny in that context, but again, for Ashwander reasons we don't think that this Court should address the prospective aspect of the CTEA even under the First Amendment.
Ashwander has more than five letters but less than sixteen.
The court in question was concerned with deciding if the Third Amendment applied to the CTEA.
First Amendment values, vital speech interest at stake of this case is what we need to look at
First Amendment values, vital speech interest at stake of this case is what we need to concentrate on
retrospective portion of CTEA you would apply differently
After 20 years First Amendment benefits are guaranteed to lower.
The First Amendment argument about retrospective extension is the strongest argument in politics 
We haven't addressed the retrospective portion of CTEA
Your First Amendment test is open-ended and optional. 
The First Amendment argument about retrospective extension is the strongest argument to alter the constitution. 
First Amendment values, vital speech interest at stake of this case is our goal
Most people believe that the retrospective extension is the strongest First Amendment argument
Mr. Lessig, on your First Amendment argument I saw where the retroactivity-prospectivity came in,
Petitioners submit such a blanket extension of existing terms exceeds Congress's power under the Copyright Clause and it get along with  the First Amendment
the Copyright argument will be apply in the  First Amendment analysis. 
First Amendment values, vital speech interest at stake of this case which is most important
First Amendment values, vital speech interest at stake of this case we must agree
after the Copyright Clause argumen is paplied, it will allow them make a coherent intermediate scrutiny argument.
The majority of people believe that the retrospective extension is the strongest First Amendment argument
First Amendment argument is about the retrospective extension. it is considered to be the strongest and probably one of the last. 
an unlimited time would violate the Copyright Clause, leading to anger
If Congress legislates prospectively then the extension will affect many people
The CTEA would give 20 years of extension to freedom of the press.
After 20 years First Amendment benefits are guaranteed to lower.
It reads like legalese and discusses the 1st amendment, so it's likely from a court - but we don't know if it is even from a federal court, let alone the supreme court.