Instruct: Given a premise, retrieve hypotheses that are entailed by the premise.
Query: We have 125 years of history of this Court making sure that the limits, both express and implied, in the Copyright Clause, have some meaning. The Feist opinion very clearly sets out the implied limits, a per se limit for originality, for the reasons Justice Breyer was trying to get me to say.
The Feist opinion outlines limits that are implied and the court has a history of making sure the limits are meaningful.
This Court's interpretation of "limited times" could eviscerate that term of no meaning.
The Framers copyright is restrictive and has rules as to what can be used.
The way this specific court interprets "limited times" could possibly but not certainly make it without clear meaning
The Feist case dealt with the responsibility vested in Congress.  
the framers decided 14 years was a constitutional limitation.
the existing terms won't set the limits Congress's power under the Copyright Clause and it violates the First Amendment.
The copyright clause justifies extensions for works that have not been created yet.
Congress extended the terms of Federal copyright five separate times.
an unlimited time would violate the Copyright Clause, adding to the confusion
Having a uniform rule was a small factor possibly contributing to why the Framers created the Copyright Clause in the Constitution.
The court should interpret "limited times" directly and clearly.
The court should interpret "limited times" directly and with clarity.
an unlimited time would violate the Copyright Clause, and not be fair
The Copyright Clause justifies the extension.
The terms of Federal copyright  have been extended more than 3 times
The 1998 act was drafted prior to the release of the Feist case. 
The Copyright Clause, was believed by the narrator, to devalue the claim
Justice Breyer opinions were never clearly implied
The terms of Federal copyright were first extended in the 19th century 
Copyrights must be for a limited time period.
an unlimited time would violate the Copyright Clause, which no one wants
The Copyright clause was given meaning by the court only recently.
We have 125 years of history of this Court making sure that all the limits, both express and implied
The court is the supreme one